Feather et al., 2023 - Google Patents
Assurance for Autonomy–JPL's past research, lessons learned, and future directionsFeather et al., 2023
View PDF- Document ID
- 16516896911590780349
- Author
- Feather M
- Pinto A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 2023 IEEE International Conference on Assured Autonomy (ICAA)
External Links
Snippet
Robotic space missions have long depended on automation, defined in the 2015 NASA Technology Roadmaps as “the automatically-controlled operation of an apparatus, process, or system using a pre-planned set of instructions (eg, a command sequence),” to react to …
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation or scheduling for a business operation
- G06Q10/06316—Sequencing of tasks or work
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/02—Knowledge representation
- G06N5/022—Knowledge engineering, knowledge acquisition
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Bernard et al. | Design of the remote agent experiment for spacecraft autonomy | |
Bernard et al. | Spacecraft autonomy flight experience: The DS1 Remote Agent experiment | |
Nayak et al. | Validating the ds-1 remote agent experiment | |
Torens et al. | Certification and software verification considerations for autonomous unmanned aircraft | |
Hobbs et al. | Space trusted autonomy readiness levels | |
Kimmel et al. | Technology readiness assessment best practices guide | |
Feather et al. | Assurance for Autonomy–JPL’s past research, lessons learned, and future directions | |
Hayden et al. | Diagnostic technology evaluation report for on-board crew launch vehicle | |
Maimone et al. | RP-check: An architecture for spaceflight command sequence validation | |
Schwabacher et al. | Pre-launch diagnostics for launch vehicles | |
Knight et al. | Leveraging multiple artificial intelligence techniques to improve the responsiveness in operations planning: Aspen for orbital express | |
Johnson et al. | The small satellite reliability initiative: A public-private effort addressing smallsat mission confidence | |
Rochford | A Model-Based Systems Engineering Approach to Refueling Satellites | |
Merladet et al. | Safety analysis of Brazilian suborbital launch operations based on system-theoretic approach | |
Pyrgies | Towards DO-178C certification of adaptive learning UAV agents designed with a cognitive architecture | |
Smith et al. | Software Assurance of Autonomous Spacecraft Control | |
Clements et al. | Tailored systems engineering processes for low cost high risk missions | |
Nelson et al. | Formal verification for a next-generation space shuttle | |
Smith et al. | Exploration technologies for operations | |
Mackey et al. | Getting diagnostic reasoning off the ground: maturing technology with TacSat-3 | |
Clements et al. | Tailored systems engineering processes for low-cost high-risk missions | |
Gundy-Burlet | MBSE Validation and Verification: Case Study for LADEE | |
Goodman | The space shuttle and GPS: A safety-critical navigation upgrade | |
Nikora et al. | Demonstrating assurance of model-based fault diagnosis systems on an operational mission | |
Mattenberger et al. | Comparative analysis of static and dynamic probabilistic risk assessment |