Dubbelboer et al., 2008 - Google Patents
The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibilityDubbelboer et al., 2008
- Document ID
- 16467668627557707955
- Author
- Dubbelboer F
- Houtgast T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- The Journal of the Acoustical Society of America
External Links
Snippet
A new concept is proposed that relates to intelligibility of speech in noise. The concept combines traditional estimations of signal-to-noise ratios (S/N) with elements from the modulation transfer function model, which results in the definition of the signal-to-noise ratio …
- 230000000051 modifying 0 title abstract description 236
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2225/00—Details of deaf aids covered by H04R25/00, not provided for in any of its subgroups
- H04R2225/43—Signal processing in hearing aids to enhance the speech intelligibility
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0208—Noise filtering
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/35—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception using translation techniques
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/06—Transformation of speech into a non-audible representation, e.g. speech visualisation or speech processing for tactile aids
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/003—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants
- G10L21/007—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants characterised by the process used
- G10L21/013—Adapting to target pitch
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Dubbelboer et al. | The concept of signal-to-noise ratio in the modulation domain and speech intelligibility | |
Jørgensen et al. | Predicting speech intelligibility based on the signal-to-noise envelope power ratio after modulation-frequency selective processing | |
Hopkins et al. | The contribution of temporal fine structure to the intelligibility of speech in steady and modulated noise | |
Li et al. | Factors influencing intelligibility of ideal binary-masked speech: Implications for noise reduction | |
Stone et al. | Notionally steady background noise acts primarily as a modulation masker of speech | |
Stone et al. | The importance for speech intelligibility of random fluctuations in “steady” background noise | |
Rosen et al. | Listening to speech in a background of other talkers: Effects of talker number and noise vocoding | |
Stone et al. | On the near non-existence of “pure” energetic masking release for speech | |
Taal et al. | An evaluation of objective measures for intelligibility prediction of time-frequency weighted noisy speech | |
Lavandier et al. | Binaural prediction of speech intelligibility in reverberant rooms with multiple noise sources | |
Li et al. | Factors influencing glimpsing of speech in noise | |
Stone et al. | Quantifying the effects of fast-acting compression on the envelope of speech | |
Koning et al. | The potential of onset enhancement for increased speech intelligibility in auditory prostheses | |
Régnier et al. | A method to identify noise-robust perceptual features: Application for consonant/t | |
Xia et al. | Effects of reverberation and noise on speech intelligibility in normal-hearing and aided hearing-impaired listeners | |
Collin et al. | Binaural speech intelligibility in rooms with variations in spatial location of sources and modulation depth of noise interferers | |
Deroche et al. | Voice segregation by difference in fundamental frequency: Evidence for harmonic cancellation | |
George et al. | The combined effects of reverberation and nonstationary noise on sentence intelligibility | |
Steinmetzger et al. | Predicting the effects of periodicity on the intelligibility of masked speech: An evaluation of different modelling approaches and their limitations | |
Schepker et al. | Speech-in-noise enhancement using amplification and dynamic range compression controlled by the speech intelligibility index | |
Deroche et al. | Speech recognition against harmonic and inharmonic complexes: Spectral dips and periodicity | |
Biberger et al. | The role of short-time intensity and envelope power for speech intelligibility and psychoacoustic masking | |
Dubbelboer et al. | A detailed study on the effects of noise on speech intelligibility | |
Payton et al. | Comparison of a short-time speech-based intelligibility metric to the speech transmission index and intelligibility data | |
Rhebergen et al. | The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise |