Ayaz et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional photography versus 3-dimensional soft tissue imagingAyaz et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 16036161344365224666
- Author
- Ayaz I
- Shaheen E
- Aly M
- Shujaat S
- Gallo G
- Coucke W
- Politis C
- Jacobs R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Imaging science in dentistry
External Links
Snippet
Purpose: This study was conducted to objectively and subjectively compare the accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional (2D) photography and 3-dimensional (3D) soft tissue imaging. Materials and Methods: Facial images of 50 volunteers (25 males, 25 females) …
- 238000003384 imaging method 0 title abstract description 57
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
- A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
- A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
- A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning
- A61B5/0064—Body surface scanning
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
- A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0002—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network
- A61B5/0004—Remote monitoring of patients using telemetry, e.g. transmission of vital signals via a communication network characterised by the type of physiological signal transmitted
- A61B5/0013—Medical image data
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
- A61B5/0082—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence adapted for particular medical purposes
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
- A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
- A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
- A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
- A61C9/006—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam projecting one or more stripes or patterns on the teeth
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ayaz et al. | Accuracy and reliability of 2-dimensional photography versus 3-dimensional soft tissue imaging | |
Richert et al. | Intraoral scanner technologies: a review to make a successful impression | |
Petrides et al. | Three-dimensional scanners for soft-tissue facial assessment in clinical practice | |
Kim et al. | Accuracy and precision of integumental linear dimensions in a three-dimensional facial imaging system | |
Patel et al. | Facial asymmetry assessment in adults using three-dimensional surface imaging | |
Zogheib et al. | Suppl-1, M2: Comparison of 3D scanning versus 2D photography for the identification of facial soft-tissue landmarks | |
Tzou et al. | Evolution of 3D surface imaging systems in facial plastic surgery | |
Moshkelgosha et al. | Photographic facial soft tissue analysis by means of linear and angular measurements in an adolescent persian population | |
Othman et al. | Validity and reproducibility of the 3D VECTRA photogrammetric surface imaging system for the maxillofacial anthropometric measurement on cleft patients | |
Kim et al. | Accuracy and reliability of digital craniofacial measurements using a small‐format, handheld 3D camera | |
Li et al. | Three-dimensional facial anthropometry of unilateral cleft lip infants with a structured light scanning system | |
Rosati et al. | The occlusal plane in the facial context: inter-operator repeatability of a new three-dimensional method | |
Zreaqat et al. | Facial dimensions of Malay children with repaired unilateral cleft lip and palate: a three dimensional analysis | |
Gallardo et al. | Evaluation of the 3D error of 2 face-scanning systems: An in vitro analysis | |
Antonacci et al. | Facial scanning technologies in the era of digital workflow: A systematic review and network meta-analysis | |
Ceinos et al. | Inter‐and intra‐operator reliability of facial and dental measurements using 3D‐stereophotogrammetry | |
Flores et al. | Comparative Assessment of a Novel Photo‐Anthropometric Landmark‐Positioning Approach for the Analysis of Facial Structures on Two‐Dimensional Images | |
Van Lint et al. | Accuracy comparison of 3D face scans obtained by portable stereophotogrammetry and smartphone applications | |
Pellitteri et al. | Accuracy of 3D facial scans: a comparison of three different scanning system in an in vivo study | |
Namano et al. | Angular asymmetries of the human face. | |
Almulla et al. | Evaluating the accuracy of facial models obtained from volume wrapping: 2D images on CBCT versus 3D on CBCT | |
Ghafoor | Reverse engineering in orthodontics | |
Kim et al. | Assessing the Correlation between Skeletal and Corresponding Soft‐Tissue Equivalents to Determine the Relationship between CBCT Skeletal/Dental Dimensions and 3D Radiographic Soft‐Tissue Equivalents | |
Cao et al. | Accuracy of three-dimensional optical devices for facial soft-tissue measurement in clinical practice of stomatology: A PRISMA systematic review | |
Esposito et al. | Reliabilty of recording occlusal contacts by using intraoral scanner and articulating paper-A prospective study |