Tahara et al., 2002 - Google Patents
Comparison of CFD and EFD for the Series 60 CB= 0.6 in steady drift motionTahara et al., 2002
View PDF- Document ID
- 15814004349342071248
- Author
- Tahara Y
- Longo J
- Stern F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of marine science and technology
External Links
Snippet
This paper presents comparisons of computational and experimental fluid dynamics results for boundary layers, wakes, and wave fields for the Series 60 CB= 0.6 ship model in steady drift motion. The numerical method solves the unsteady Reynolds-averaged Navier–Stokes …
- 230000000694 effects 0 abstract description 29
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
- G06F17/5018—Computer-aided design using simulation using finite difference methods or finite element methods
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Parolini et al. | Mathematical models and numerical simulations for the America’s Cup | |
Tahara et al. | Comparison of CFD and EFD for the Series 60 CB= 0.6 in steady drift motion | |
Ozdemir et al. | Numerical study of ship motions and added resistance in regular incident waves of KVLCC2 model | |
Arai et al. | A computing method for the analysis of water impact of arbitrary shaped bodies | |
Fureby et al. | A computational study of the flow around the KVLCC2 model hull at straight ahead conditions and at drift | |
Khazaee et al. | Hydrodynamic evaluation of a planing hull in calm water using RANS and Savitsky's method | |
Javanmard et al. | Hydrodynamic characteristic curves and behavior of flow around a surface-piercing propeller using computational fluid dynamics based on FVM | |
Luo et al. | Numerical simulation of the hydrodynamic characteristics of unmanned underwater vehicles near ice surface | |
Larsson et al. | Failures, fantasies, and feats in the theoretical/numerical prediction of ship performance | |
Bal | Free surface effects on 2-D airfoils and 3-D wings moving over water | |
Kawamura et al. | Simulation of nonlinear ship flows by density-function method | |
Kim et al. | Steady flow approximations in three-dimensional ship motion calculation | |
Jahanbakhsh et al. | Catamaran motion simulation based on moving grid technique | |
Shan et al. | Froude–Krylov nonlinear computations of three dimensional wave loads by a hybrid time domain boundary element method | |
Lin et al. | A fully nonlinear, dynamically consistent numerical model for solid-body ship motion. i. ship motion with fixed heading | |
Behbahani-Nejad et al. | Reduced-order modeling of three-dimensional unsteady partial cavity flows | |
Islam et al. | Prediction of ship resistance in head waves using OpenFOAM | |
Shamsi et al. | A Comparison of the BEM and RANS Calculations for the hydrodynamic performance of the PODS | |
Arslan et al. | Investigation of the flow around two interacting ship-like sections | |
Chowdhury et al. | Seakeeping analysis of a tanker with hard sail-based wind propulsion system in various seaways | |
Belibassakis et al. | A novel BEM-isogeometric method with application to the wavemaking resistance problem of bodies at constant speed | |
Yao et al. | Method to calculate resistance of high-speed displacement ship taking the effect of dynamic sinkage and trim and fluid viscosity into account | |
Hino et al. | Numerical simulation of flow around a waterjet propelled ship | |
Lagemann | Efficient seakeeping performance predictions with CFD | |
Lin et al. | Investigation of the Seakeeping Performance of Twin Hull Vessels by Different Computational Methods |