[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Duvall et al., 2000 - Google Patents

On-line optimization of the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem

Duvall et al., 2000

View PDF
Document ID
15787057017935134090
Author
Duvall P
Riggs J
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of Process Control

External Links

Snippet

On-line, optimal steady state operating conditions were determined for the six modes of operation (with and without disturbances) for the industrial recycle reactor problem proposed by Downs and Vogel (JJ Downs, EF Vogel, A plant-wide industrial process control problem …
Continue reading at ttu-ir.tdl.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
    • G05B13/048—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators using a predictor
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
    • G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
    • G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
    • G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
    • G05B13/027—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion using neural networks only
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
    • G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Seki et al. Industrial application of a nonlinear model predictive control to polymerization reactors
Klatt et al. Gain-scheduling trajectory control of a continuous stirred tank reactor
Chatzidoukas et al. Optimal grade transition and selection of closed-loop controllers in a gas-phase olefin polymerization fluidized bed reactor
Ziogou et al. Model predictive control (MPC) strategies for PEM fuel cell systems–A comparative experimental demonstration
Duvall et al. On-line optimization of the Tennessee Eastman challenge problem
Hager et al. Interaction of design and control: Optimization with dynamic models
Downs et al. An industrial and academic perspective on plantwide control
JP4002305B2 (en) Polymerization process controller
Biegler Advanced optimization strategies for integrated dynamic process operations
Figueroa et al. Economic impact of disturbances and uncertain parameters in chemical processes—A dynamic back-off analysis
Engell et al. Control of a reactive separation process
Patwardhan et al. Nonlinear model-predictive control of distributed-parameter systems
Abou-Jeyab et al. Constrained multivariable control of a distillation column using a simplified model predictive control algorithm
Jamaludin et al. Approximation of closed-loop prediction for dynamic real-time optimization calculations
Minasidis et al. Simple rules for economic plantwide control
Venkateswarlu et al. Nonlinear model predictive control of reactive distillation based on stochastic optimization
Huang et al. Distributed economic model predictive control for an industrial fluid catalytic cracking unit ensuring safe operation
Wright et al. Nonlinear model predictive control of a fixed-bed water-gas shift reactor: An experimental study
Ricardez-Sandoval et al. Simultaneous design and control of chemical processes with application to the Tennessee Eastman process
Abel et al. Scenario-integrated on-line optimisation of batch reactors
Qiu et al. Application of a plant-wide control design to the HDA process
Harris et al. Self-tuning and adaptive controllers: an application to catalytic reactor control
Sneesby et al. A multi-objective control scheme for an ETBE reactive distillation column
Arellano-Garcia et al. Close-loop stochastic dynamic optimization under probabilistic output-constraints
Golshan et al. Stochastic and global real time optimization of Tennessee Eastman challenge problem