Ojala et al., 2014 - Google Patents
The accuracy of Acuros XB algorithm for radiation beams traversing a metallic hip implant—comparison with measurements and Monte Carlo calculationsOjala et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 15570282869525895145
- Author
- Ojala J
- Kapanen M
- Sipilä P
- Hyödynmaa S
- Pitkänen M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of applied clinical medical physics
External Links
Snippet
In this study, the clinical benefit of the improved accuracy of the Acuros XB (AXB) algorithm, implemented in a commercial radiotherapy treatment planning system (TPS), Varian Eclipse, was demonstrated with beams traversing a high‐Z material. This is also the first study …
- 238000004422 calculation algorithm 0 title abstract description 97
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/1048—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
- A61N5/1075—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for testing, calibrating, or quality assurance of the radiation treatment apparatus
- A61N2005/1076—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for testing, calibrating, or quality assurance of the radiation treatment apparatus using a dummy object placed in the radiation field, e.g. phantom
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/103—Treatment planning systems
- A61N5/1031—Treatment planning systems using a specific method of dose optimization
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/1048—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods
- A61N5/1049—Monitoring, verifying, controlling systems and methods for verifying the position of the patient with respect to the radiation beam
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N2005/1085—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy characterised by the type of particles applied to the patient
- A61N2005/1087—Ions; Protons
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N2005/1092—Details
- A61N2005/1096—Elements inserted into the radiation path placed on the patient, e.g. bags, bolus, compensators
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/1042—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy with spatial modulation of the radiation beam within the treatment head
- A61N5/1043—Scanning the radiation beam, e.g. spot scanning or raster scanning
- A61N5/1044—Scanning the radiation beam, e.g. spot scanning or raster scanning with multiple repetitions of the scanning pattern
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N5/00—Radiation therapy
- A61N5/10—X-ray therapy; Gamma-ray therapy; Particle-irradiation therapy
- A61N5/1077—Beam delivery systems
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/58—Testing, adjusting or calibrating devices for radiation diagnosis
- A61B6/582—Calibration
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
- A61B6/48—Diagnostic techniques
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ojala et al. | The accuracy of Acuros XB algorithm for radiation beams traversing a metallic hip implant—comparison with measurements and Monte Carlo calculations | |
Schuemann et al. | Site-specific range uncertainties caused by dose calculation algorithms for proton therapy | |
Jiang et al. | Effects of Hounsfield number conversion on CT based proton Monte Carlo dose calculations | |
Stern et al. | Verification of monitor unit calculations for non‐IMRT clinical radiotherapy: report of AAPM Task Group 114 | |
Wendling et al. | In aqua vivo EPID dosimetry | |
Paganetti | Range uncertainties in proton therapy and the role of Monte Carlo simulations | |
Ojala et al. | Performance of dose calculation algorithms from three generations in lung SBRT: comparison with full Monte Carlo‐based dose distributions | |
Kan et al. | Experimental verification of the Acuros XB and AAA dose calculation adjacent to heterogeneous media for IMRT and RapidArc of nasopharygeal carcinoma | |
Kan et al. | Verification and dosimetric impact of Acuros XB algorithm on intensity modulated stereotactic radiotherapy for locally persistent nasopharyngeal carcinoma | |
Van Elmpt et al. | Experimental verification of a portal dose prediction model | |
McCowan et al. | An in vivo dose verification method for SBRT–VMAT delivery using the EPID | |
Elcim et al. | Dosimetric comparison of pencil beam and Monte Carlo algorithms in conformal lung radiotherapy | |
Winterhalter et al. | Evaluation of GATE‐RTion (GATE/Geant4) Monte Carlo simulation settings for proton pencil beam scanning quality assurance | |
Tyagi et al. | Comparing measurement‐derived (3DVH) and machine log file‐derived dose reconstruction methods for VMAT QA in patient geometries | |
Hauri et al. | Whole‐body dose equivalent including neutrons is similar for 6 MV and 15 MV IMRT, VMAT, and 3D conformal radiotherapy | |
Ojala et al. | Quantification of dose differences between two versions of Acuros XB algorithm compared to Monte Carlo simulations—the effect on clinical patient treatment planning | |
Davidson et al. | Heterogeneity dose calculation accuracy in IMRT: Study of five commercial treatment planning systems using an anthropomorphic thorax phantom | |
Spirydovich et al. | High density dental materials and radiotherapy planning: comparison of the dose predictions using superposition algorithm and fluence map Monte Carlo method with radiochromic film measurements | |
Pecharromán‐Gallego et al. | Simplifying EPID dosimetry for IMRT treatment verification | |
Jia et al. | Proton therapy dose distribution comparison between Monte Carlo and a treatment planning system for pediatric patients with ependymoma a | |
Kawahara et al. | Dosimetric impact of Lipiodol in stereotactic body radiation therapy on liver after trans‐arterial chemoembolization | |
Poon et al. | Development of a scatter correction technique and its application to HDR multicatheter breast brachytherapy | |
Akdeniz et al. | Effects of metal implants and a metal artifact reduction tool on calculation accuracy of AAA and Acuros XB algorithms in small fields | |
Kawata et al. | Evaluation of newly implemented dose calculation algorithms for multileaf collimator‐based CyberKnife tumor‐tracking radiotherapy | |
Grofsmid et al. | Dosimetric validation of a commercial Monte Carlo based IMRT planning system |