Kahn et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does?Kahn et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 14725387725371146649
- Author
- Kahn L
- Lum P
- Rymer W
- Reinkensmeyer D
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of rehabilitation research and development
External Links
Snippet
Robot-assisted movement training improves arm movement ability following acute and chronic stroke. Such training involves two interacting processes: the patient trying to move and the robot applying forces to the patient's arm. A fundamental principle of motor learning …
- 238000004805 robotic 0 abstract description 49
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
- A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
- A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
- A61H2201/5058—Sensors or detectors
- A61H2201/5071—Pressure sensors
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
- A61H1/00—Apparatus for passive exercising; Vibrating apparatus ; Chiropractic devices, e.g. body impacting devices, external devices for briefly extending or aligning unbroken bones
- A61H1/02—Stretching or bending or torsioning apparatus for exercising
- A61H1/0274—Stretching or bending or torsioning apparatus for exercising for the upper limbs
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
- A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
- A61H2201/50—Control means thereof
- A61H2201/5007—Control means thereof computer controlled
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61H—PHYSICAL THERAPY APPARATUS, e.g. DEVICES FOR LOCATING OR STIMULATING REFLEX POINTS IN THE BODY; ARTIFICIAL RESPIRATION; MASSAGE; BATHING DEVICES FOR SPECIAL THERAPEUTIC OR HYGIENIC PURPOSES OR SPECIFIC PARTS OF THE BODY
- A61H2201/00—Characteristics of apparatus not provided for in the preceding codes
- A61H2201/16—Physical interface with patient
- A61H2201/1657—Movement of interface, i.e. force application means
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kahn et al. | Robot-assisted movement training for the stroke-impaired arm: Does it matter what the robot does? | |
Akdoğan et al. | Hybrid impedance control of a robot manipulator for wrist and forearm rehabilitation: Performance analysis and clinical results | |
Pignolo | Robotics in neuro-rehabilitation. | |
Riener et al. | Robot-aided neurorehabilitation of the upper extremities | |
Babaiasl et al. | A review of technological and clinical aspects of robot-aided rehabilitation of upper-extremity after stroke | |
Marchal-Crespo et al. | Review of control strategies for robotic movement training after neurologic injury | |
Hussain et al. | A soft supernumerary robotic finger and mobile arm support for grasping compensation and hemiparetic upper limb rehabilitation | |
Jarrassé et al. | Robotic exoskeletons: a perspective for the rehabilitation of arm coordination in stroke patients | |
Colombo et al. | Robotic techniques for upper limb evaluation and rehabilitation of stroke patients | |
Lum et al. | MIME robotic device for upper-limb neurorehabilitation in subacute stroke subjects: A follow-up study. | |
Fasoli et al. | Robotic technology and stroke rehabilitation: translating research into practice | |
Vaca Benitez et al. | Exoskeleton Technology in Rehabilitation: Towards an EMG‐Based Orthosis System for Upper Limb Neuromotor Rehabilitation | |
Loureiro et al. | Advances in upper limb stroke rehabilitation: a technology push | |
Meadmore et al. | Functional electrical stimulation mediated by iterative learning control and 3D robotics reduces motor impairment in chronic stroke | |
Wolbrecht et al. | Optimizing compliant, model-based robotic assistance to promote neurorehabilitation | |
Stienen et al. | Dampace: dynamic force-coordination trainer for the upper extremities | |
Bouteraa et al. | Design and control of an exoskeleton robot with EMG-driven electrical stimulation for upper limb rehabilitation | |
Lewis et al. | An assessment of robot-assisted bimanual movements on upper limb motor coordination following stroke | |
Riener et al. | Human-centered rehabilitation robotics | |
Huang et al. | Robot-assisted post-stroke motion rehabilitation in upper extremities: a survey | |
Reinkensmeyer et al. | Some key problems for robot-assisted movement therapy research: a perspective from the University of California at Irvine | |
Brokaw et al. | Using the kinect to limit abnormal kinematics and compensation strategies during therapy with end effector robots | |
Bouteraa et al. | Exoskeleton robots for upper-limb rehabilitation | |
Krebs et al. | Forging mens et manus: The mit experience in upper extremity robotic therapy | |
Marchal-Crespo et al. | Technology of the robotic gait orthosis lokomat |