South Palomares et al., 2018 - Google Patents
Facial first impressions of partner preference traits: Trustworthiness, status, and attractivenessSouth Palomares et al., 2018
View PDF- Document ID
- 14588218498241555529
- Author
- South Palomares J
- Young A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Social Psychological and Personality Science
External Links
Snippet
This research used the minimal exposure paradigm to examine facial first impressions of traits of trustworthiness, status, and attractiveness, considered important in verbal models of partner preferences. Heterosexual participants rated opposite-sex faces comprising either …
- 230000001815 facial 0 title abstract description 24
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| South Palomares et al. | Facial first impressions of partner preference traits: Trustworthiness, status, and attractiveness | |
| Pronk et al. | A rejection mind-set: Choice overload in online dating | |
| Wang et al. | The longitudinal and reciprocal relationships between selfie-related behaviors and self-objectification and appearance concerns among adolescents | |
| Lamba et al. | Anxiety impedes adaptive social learning under uncertainty | |
| Jakesch et al. | Finding meaning in art: Preferred levels of ambiguity in art appreciation | |
| Szczurek et al. | The stranger effect: The rejection of affective deviants | |
| Herman | Do you see what I am? How observers’ backgrounds affect their perceptions of multiracial faces | |
| Re et al. | Selfie indulgence: self-favoring biases in perceptions of selfies | |
| Park et al. | Effects of a future time perspective–based career intervention on career decisions | |
| Koumoundourou et al. | Core self-evaluations, career decision self-efficacy, and vocational identity among Greek adolescents | |
| Craig et al. | A test of spatial contiguity for virtual human’s gestures in multimedia learning environments | |
| Elmholdt et al. | Counting sleep: Ambiguity, aspirational control and the politics of digital self-tracking at work | |
| Crosby et al. | Where do we look during potentially offensive behavior? | |
| Chiappe et al. | Cheaters are looked at longer and remembered better than cooperators in social exchange situations | |
| Gross et al. | Emotion regulation in intractable conflicts | |
| Duffy et al. | The extravert advantage: How and when extraverts build rapport with other people | |
| Sels et al. | Actual and perceived emotional similarity in couples’ daily lives | |
| Brock Baskin et al. | Time banditry and impression management behavior: Prediction and profiling of time bandit types | |
| Penning de Vries et al. | Shared perceptions of supervisor support: What processes make supervisors and employees see eye to eye? | |
| Chen et al. | Implicit attitude generalization from Black to Black–White biracial group members | |
| Kalkhoff et al. | Cracking the black box: Capturing the role of expectation states in status processes | |
| Collins et al. | Methods and approaches for enhancing communication with people with moderate-to-severe dementia that can facilitate their inclusion in research and service evaluation: Findings from the IDEAL programme | |
| Meliou et al. | Negotiating gendered ageing: Intersectional reflexivity and experiences of incongruity of self-employed older women | |
| Reed et al. | Emotional tears: An honest signal of trustworthiness increasing prosocial behavior? | |
| Edwards et al. | Individual differences in self-esteem and social anxiety predict problem smartphone use in adolescents |