[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Smith et al., 2019 - Google Patents

Modeling land subsidence using InSAR and airborne electromagnetic data

Smith et al., 2019

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
14585580976071517470
Author
Smith R
Knight R
Publication year
Publication venue
Water Resources Research

External Links

Snippet

Land subsidence as a result of groundwater overpumping in the San Joaquin Valley, California, is associated with the loss of groundwater storage and aquifer contamination. Although the physical processes governing land subsidence are well understood, building …
Continue reading at agupubs.onlinelibrary.wiley.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/62—Physical property of subsurface
    • G01V2210/624—Reservoir parameters
    • G01V2210/6248—Pore pressure
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/003—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design
    • G01V1/005—Seismic data acquisition in general, e.g. survey design with exploration systems emitting special signals, e.g. frequency swept signals, pulse sequences or slip sweep arrangements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
    • G01V2210/616—Data from specific type of measurement
    • G01V2210/6163—Electromagnetic
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
    • G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
    • G01V2210/60—Analysis
    • G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/38—Processing data, e.g. for analysis, for interpretation, for correction
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
    • G01V3/08—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with magnetic or electric fields produced or modified by objects or geological structures or by detecting devices
    • G01V3/083—Controlled source electromagnetic [CSEM] surveying
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V9/00—Prospecting or detecting by methods not provided for in groups G01V1/00 - G01V8/00
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
    • G01V8/00—Prospecting or detecting by optical means
    • G01V8/02—Prospecting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Smith et al. Modeling land subsidence using InSAR and airborne electromagnetic data
Smith et al. Estimating the permanent loss of groundwater storage in the southern S an J oaquin V alley, C alifornia
Hoffmann et al. Inverse modeling of interbed storage parameters using land subsidence observations, Antelope Valley, California
Miller et al. Aquifer mechanical properties and decelerated compaction in Tucson, Arizona
Li et al. Coupled time‐lapse full‐waveform inversion for subsurface flow problems using intrusive automatic differentiation
Miller et al. Spatiotemporal characterization of land subsidence and uplift in Phoenix using InSAR time series and wavelet transforms
Chaussard et al. Predictability of hydraulic head changes and characterization of aquifer‐system and fault properties from InSAR‐derived ground deformation
Cardiff et al. A field proof‐of‐concept of aquifer imaging using 3‐D transient hydraulic tomography with modular, temporarily‐emplaced equipment
Berg et al. Three‐dimensional transient hydraulic tomography in a highly heterogeneous glaciofluvial aquifer‐aquitard system
Chaussard et al. A new method for isolating elastic from inelastic deformation in aquifer systems: Application to the San Joaquin Valley, CA
Tso et al. On the field estimation of moisture content using electrical geophysics: The impact of petrophysical model uncertainty
Reeves et al. Estimating temporal changes in hydraulic head using InSAR data in the San Luis Valley, Colorado
Kennedy et al. Direct measurement of subsurface mass change using the variable baseline gravity gradient method
Kurtz et al. Joint assimilation of piezometric heads and groundwater temperatures for improved modeling of river‐aquifer interactions
Keating et al. Combined geophysical measurements provide evidence for unfrozen water in permafrost in the Adventdalen valley in Svalbard
Reeves et al. High quality InSAR data linked to seasonal change in hydraulic head for an agricultural area in the San Luis Valley, Colorado
Moysey et al. A framework for inferring field‐scale rock physics relationships through numerical simulation
Goda et al. Variability of tsunami inundation footprints considering stochastic scenarios based on a single rupture model: application to the 2011 T ohoku earthquake
Barbour et al. Subsidence rates at the southern Salton Sea consistent with reservoir depletion
Chen et al. Three‐dimensional Bayesian geostatistical aquifer characterization at the Hanford 300 Area using tracer test data
Chen et al. The temporal and spatial variability of the confined aquifer head and storage properties in the San Luis Valley, Colorado inferred from multiple InSAR missions
Singha et al. Hydrogeophysical tracking of three‐dimensional tracer migration: The concept and application of apparent petrophysical relations
Dogan et al. Hydrostratigraphic analysis of the MADE site with full‐resolution GPR and direct‐push hydraulic profiling
Kang et al. Sequential approach to joint flow‐seismic inversion for improved characterization of fractured media
Herckenrath et al. Coupled hydrogeophysical inversion using time‐lapse magnetic resonance sounding and time‐lapse gravity data for hydraulic aquifer testing: Will it work in practice?