[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Sims et al., 2009 - Google Patents

Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions

Sims et al., 2009

View PDF @Full View
Document ID
14476199621470427006
Author
Sims G
Jun S
Wu G
Kim S
Publication year
Publication venue
Proceedings of the National Academy of Sciences

External Links

Snippet

For comparison of whole-genome (genic+ nongenic) sequences, multiple sequence alignment of a few selected genes is not appropriate. One approach is to use an alignment- free method in which feature (or l-mer) frequency profiles (FFP) of whole genomes are used …
Continue reading at www.pnas.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/21Text processing
    • G06F17/22Manipulating or registering by use of codes, e.g. in sequence of text characters
    • G06F17/2217Character encodings

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Sims et al. Alignment-free genome comparison with feature frequency profiles (FFP) and optimal resolutions
Armstrong et al. Progressive Cactus is a multiple-genome aligner for the thousand-genome era
Rakocevic et al. Fast and accurate genomic analyses using genome graphs
Sibbesen et al. Accurate genotyping across variant classes and lengths using variant graphs
Hoffmann et al. Fast mapping of short sequences with mismatches, insertions and deletions using index structures
Bouchard-Côté et al. Automated reconstruction of ancient languages using probabilistic models of sound change
Stormo An introduction to sequence similarity (“homology”) searching
Pritchard et al. Inference of population structure using multilocus genotype data
Thomson et al. A critical appraisal of the use of microRNA data in phylogenetics
Wu et al. Most parsimonious reconciliation in the presence of gene duplication, loss, and deep coalescence using labeled coalescent trees
Rodrigo et al. The perils of plenty: what are we going to do with all these genes?
Bouchard-Côté et al. Evolutionary inference via the Poisson indel process
Forslund et al. Evolution of protein domain architectures
Westesson et al. Accurate reconstruction of insertion-deletion histories by statistical phylogenetics
Keul et al. PFASUM: a substitution matrix from Pfam structural alignments
Prezza et al. SNPs detection by eBWT positional clustering
Sirén et al. Genotyping common, large structural variations in 5,202 genomes using pangenomes, the Giraffe mapper, and the vg toolkit
Höhl et al. Pattern-based phylogenetic distance estimation and tree reconstruction
Chang et al. Phylogenetic profiles reveal evolutionary relationships within the “twilight zone” of sequence similarity
Dinu et al. An efficient rank based approach for closest string and closest substring
Zerbino et al. Integrating genomes
Pellegrini et al. TRStalker: an efficient heuristic for finding fuzzy tandem repeats
Miller et al. CAM: an alignment-free method to recover phylogenies using codon aversion motifs
Soares et al. Sequence Comparison Alignment‐Free Approach Based on Suffix Tree and L-Words Frequency
Papadantonakis et al. CoMuS: simulating coalescent histories and polymorphic data from multiple species