Karagül et al., 2019 - Google Patents
Estimation of peak runoff and frequency in an ungauged stream of a forested watershed for flood hazard mappingKaragül et al., 2019
View PDF- Document ID
- 1426663454316263461
- Author
- Karagül R
- Çitgez T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Forestry Research
External Links
Snippet
Kaynasli District in the western Black Sea region of Turkey has long been vulnerable to frequent flood damage due to the establishment of settlements within and around stream channels without regard to fluctuating peak-streamflow frequencies. The aim of this research …
- 238000004458 analytical method 0 abstract description 15
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
- G06T17/05—Geographic models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01W—METEOROLOGY
- G01W1/00—Meteorology
- G01W1/10—Devices for predicting weather conditions
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups
- G01C21/26—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups specially adapted for navigation in a road network
- G01C21/28—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups specially adapted for navigation in a road network with correlation of data from several navigational instruments
- G01C21/30—Map- or contour-matching
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01C—MEASURING DISTANCES, LEVELS OR BEARINGS; SURVEYING; NAVIGATION; GYROSCOPIC INSTRUMENTS; PHOTOGRAMMETRY OR VIDEOGRAMMETRY
- G01C21/00—Navigation; Navigational instruments not provided for in preceding groups
- G01C21/20—Instruments for performing navigational calculations
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/10—Complex mathematical operations
- G06F17/18—Complex mathematical operations for evaluating statistical data, e.g. average values, frequency distributions, probability functions, regression analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Chang et al. | Hazard assessment of debris flows in the Wenchuan earthquake-stricken area, South West China | |
Desalegn et al. | Mapping flood inundation areas using GIS and HEC-RAS model at Fetam River, Upper Abbay Basin, Ethiopia | |
Pradhan et al. | A 100‐year maximum flood susceptibility mapping using integrated hydrological and hydrodynamic models: Kelantan River Corridor, Malaysia | |
Dolojan et al. | Mapping method of rainfall-induced landslide hazards by infiltration and slope stability analysis: A case study in Marumori, Miyagi, Japan, during the October 2019 Typhoon Hagibis | |
Gajbhiye et al. | Simplified sediment yield index model incorporating parameter curve number | |
Pradhan et al. | Spatial model integration for shallow landslide susceptibility and its runout using a GIS-based approach in Yongin, Korea | |
Sanyal et al. | Hydraulic routing of extreme floods in a large ungauged river and the estimation of associated uncertainties: a case study of the Damodar River, India | |
Sanjay Shekar et al. | Performance of HEC-HMS and SWAT to simulate streamflow in the sub-humid tropical Hemavathi catchment | |
Zhang et al. | Comparison of the CEST and SLOSH models for storm surge flooding | |
Loftis et al. | Using lidar elevation data to develop a topobathymetric digital elevation model for sub-grid inundation modeling at langley research center | |
Shen et al. | Effects of DEM resolution and resampling technique on building treatment for urban inundation modeling: a case study for the 2016 flooding of the HUST campus in Wuhan | |
Şen et al. | Flash flood inundation map preparation for wadis in arid regions | |
Ahmadi et al. | Evaluation of WEPP and EPM for improved predictions of soil erosion in mountainous watersheds: A case study of Kangir River basin, Iran | |
de Arruda Gomes et al. | Hydrologic models coupled with 2D hydrodynamic model for high-resolution urban flood simulation | |
Gao et al. | Flood hazards in urban environment | |
Sharif et al. | Application of a distributed hydrologic model to the November 17, 2004, flood of Bull Creek watershed, Austin, Texas | |
Echogdali et al. | Spatial prediction of flood frequency analysis in a semi-arid zone: a case study from the Seyad Basin (Guelmim Region, Morocco) | |
Sharif et al. | Physically based hydrological modeling of the 2002 floods in San Antonio, Texas | |
Hjelmstad et al. | Propagation of radar rainfall uncertainties into urban pluvial flood modeling during the North American monsoon | |
Shastry et al. | Using steady‐state backwater analysis to predict inundated area from national water model streamflow simulations | |
Hidayah et al. | Flood hazard mapping of the welang river, pasuruan, east java, indonesia | |
Goswami et al. | Assessment of glacial lake development and downstream flood impacts of critical glacial lake | |
Dragičević et al. | Modification of erosion potential method using climate and land cover parameters | |
Karagül et al. | Estimation of peak runoff and frequency in an ungauged stream of a forested watershed for flood hazard mapping | |
Williams et al. | Geographic information system data considerations in the context of the enhanced bathtub model for coastal inundation |