Lockhart et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional studyLockhart et al., 2008
View HTML- Document ID
- 14113815020355149334
- Author
- Lockhart M
- Fielding J
- Richter H
- Brubaker L
- Salomon C
- Ye W
- Hakim C
- Wai C
- Stolpen A
- Weber A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Radiology
External Links
Snippet
Purpose: To assess the reproducibility of bone and soft-tissue pelvimetry measurements obtained from dynamic magnetic resonance (MR) imaging studies in primiparous women across multiple centers. Materials and Methods: All subjects prospectively gave consent for …
- 238000005259 measurement 0 title abstract description 76
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/05—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves
- A61B5/055—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnosis by means of electric currents or magnetic fields; Measuring using microwaves or radiowaves involving electronic or nuclear magnetic resonance, e.g. magnetic resonance imaging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
- G06F19/321—Management of medical image data, e.g. communication or archiving systems such as picture archiving and communication systems [PACS] or related medical protocols such as digital imaging and communications in medicine protocol [DICOM]; Editing of medical image data, e.g. adding diagnosis information
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
- G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
- G06F19/34—Computer-assisted medical diagnosis or treatment, e.g. computerised prescription or delivery of medication or diets, computerised local control of medical devices, medical expert systems or telemedicine
- G06F19/345—Medical expert systems, neural networks or other automated diagnosis
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B8/00—Diagnosis using ultrasonic, sonic or infrasonic waves
- A61B8/08—Detecting organic movements or changes, e.g. tumours, cysts, swellings
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T7/00—Image analysis
- G06T7/0002—Inspection of images, e.g. flaw detection
- G06T7/0012—Biomedical image inspection
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K49/00—Preparations for testing in vivo
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T2207/00—Indexing scheme for image analysis or image enhancement
- G06T2207/30—Subject of image; Context of image processing
- G06T2207/30004—Biomedical image processing
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Lockhart et al. | Reproducibility of dynamic MR imaging pelvic measurements: a multi-institutional study | |
| Beets-Tan et al. | Measurement of anal sphincter muscles: endoanal US, endoanal MR imaging, or phased-array MR imaging? A study with healthy volunteers | |
| Hoffmann et al. | Clinicians’ expectations of the benefits and harms of treatments, screening, and tests: a systematic review | |
| Poortman et al. | Comparison of CT and sonography in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis: a blinded prospective study | |
| Lee et al. | Objective criteria of triangular cord sign in biliary atresia on US scans | |
| Puri et al. | Physicians’ and midlevel providers’ awareness of lifetime radiation–attributable cancer risk associated with commonly performed CT studies: relationship to practice behavior | |
| Orth et al. | Prospective comparison of MR imaging and US for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis | |
| Robbie et al. | Visual and automated CT measurements of lung volume loss in idiopathic pulmonary fibrosis | |
| Freedman | Evaluating and comparing imaging techniques: a review and classification of study designs | |
| Harvey et al. | Evacuation proctography: a prospective study of diagnostic and therapeutic effects | |
| Dietz et al. | Is it necessary to diagnose levator avulsion on pelvic floor muscle contraction? | |
| Ward et al. | Fetal lung volume measurements: determination with MR imaging—effect of various factors | |
| Stern et al. | Magnetic resonance enterography in pregnant women with Crohn’s disease: case series and literature review | |
| Kikuchi et al. | Evaluation of the usefulness of the MRI jelly method for diagnosing complete cul‐de‐sac obliteration | |
| Bartlett et al. | Comparison of routine pelvic US and MR imaging in patients with pathologically confirmed endometriosis | |
| Szaflarski et al. | Evaluating the frequency and severity of ovarian venous congestion on adult computed tomography | |
| Sagberg et al. | Placental volume in gestational week 27 measured by three‐dimensional ultrasound and magnetic resonance imaging | |
| Subramaniam et al. | Radiology knowledge in new medical graduates in New Zealand | |
| Huber et al. | Use of endoanal ultrasound in detecting obstetric anal sphincter injury immediately after birth | |
| Sharman et al. | MRI of small bowel Crohn’s disease: determining the reproducibility of bowel wall gadolinium enhancement measurements | |
| Millischer et al. | Standardized fetal anatomical examination using magnetic resonance imaging: a feasibility study | |
| Norderval et al. | Three‐dimensional endoanal ultrasonography: intraobserver and interobserver agreement using scoring systems for classification of anal sphincter defects | |
| Gupta et al. | ACR appropriateness criteria® acute onset flank pain-suspicion of stone disease (urolithiasis) | |
| Khatri et al. | Influence of rectal gel volume on defecation during dynamic pelvic floor magnetic resonance imaging | |
| Siddiqui et al. | Accuracy of MRI pelvis in the diagnosis of ovarian endometrioma: using histopathology as gold standard |