[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Kirthiga et al., 2023 - Google Patents

Assessment of OXIS contacts-a comparison of three methods

Kirthiga et al., 2023

View PDF
Document ID
14039029964746152088
Author
Kirthiga M
Tejasvi R
Srivarshani S
Muthu M
Publication year
Publication venue
European Archives of Paediatric Dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Purpose To compare OXIS contacts by means of Replication using Sectional die Models (RSM) and Photographs of the Models (PM) with Direct Clinical Examination (DCE) in a sample of preschool children aged 3–4 years. Methods A retrospective cross-sectional study …
Continue reading at drive.google.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B6/00—Apparatus for radiation diagnosis, e.g. combined with radiation therapy equipment
    • A61B6/14—Applications or adaptations for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/0059—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons using light, e.g. diagnosis by transillumination, diascopy, fluorescence
    • A61B5/0062—Arrangements for scanning

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Chalmers et al. Intraoral 3D scanning or dental impressions for the assessment of dental arch relationships in cleft care: which is superior?
Golkari et al. A comparison of photographic, replication and direct clinical examination methods for detecting developmental defects of enamel
Ekstrand et al. The reliability and accuracy of two methods for proximal caries detection and depth on directly visible proximal surfaces: an in vitro study
Astvaldsdottir et al. Approximal caries detection by DIFOTI: in vitro comparison of diagnostic accuracy/efficacy with film and digital radiography
Papamanou et al. Appreciation of cleft lip and palate treatment outcome by professionals and laypeople
Subbalekshmi et al. Use of a teledentistry-based program for screening of early childhood caries in a school setting
Bottenberg et al. Comparison of occlusal caries detection using the ICDAS criteria on extracted teeth or their photographs
Estai et al. Validity and reliability of remote dental screening by different oral health professionals using a store-and-forward telehealth model
Parviainen et al. Evaluating performance of dental caries detection methods among third-year dental students
Pinto et al. Validation of the digital photographic assessment to diagnose traumatic dental injuries
Piovesan et al. Laboratorial training of examiners for using a visual caries detection system in epidemiological surveys
Laitala et al. Validity of Digital Imaging of Fiber‐Optic Transillumination in Caries Detection on Proximal Tooth Surfaces
Goyal et al. Prevalence, defect characteristics and distribution of other phenotypes in 3-to 6-year-old children affected with Hypomineralised Second Primary Molars
Rushton et al. A study to determine the added value of 740 screening panoramic radiographs compared to intraoral radiography in the management of adult (> 18 years) dentate patients in a primary care setting
Hoskin et al. Can we trust visual methods alone for detecting caries in teeth?
Diniz et al. Influence of examiner’s clinical experience on the reproducibility and accuracy of radiographic examination in detecting occlusal caries
Kragt et al. Three-dimensional photographs for determining the Index of Orthodontic Treatment Need in scientific studies
Bronson et al. Clinical acceptability of crown margins versus marginal gaps as determined by pre‐doctoral students and prosthodontists
O’Hara et al. Evaluation of the assessment of tooth wear by general dental practitioners
Knivsberg et al. Digitalised exercise material in forensic odontology
Lim et al. Reliability and accuracy of 2D photogrammetry: a comparison with direct measurement
Toraman Alkurt et al. In vivo comparison of laser fluorescence measurements with conventional methods for occlusal caries detection
Mesinger et al. Evaluation of direct restorations using the revised FDI criteria: results from a reliability study
Kirthiga et al. Assessment of OXIS contacts-a comparison of three methods
Muller-Bolla et al. Performance of a recent light fluorescence device for detection of occlusal carious lesions in children and adolescents