[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Burk et al., 2004 - Google Patents

Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry

Burk et al., 2004

View PDF
Document ID
13699517139533596387
Author
Burk M
Wiley T
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

The purpose of this study was to compare auditory thresholds obtained for continuous and pulsed tones in listeners with normal hearing. Auditory thresholds, test—retest reliability, falsepositive responses, and listener preference were compared for both signals. Hearing …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/04Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
    • A61B5/0476Electroencephalography
    • A61B5/0484Electroencephalography using evoked response
    • A61B5/04845Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
    • A61B5/165Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/68Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
    • A61B5/6801Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
    • A61B5/6813Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
    • A61B5/6814Head
    • A61B5/6815Ear
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48Other medical applications

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Wilson et al. An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss
Burk et al. Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry
Eikelboom et al. Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer
Margolis et al. AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. Sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps
Lister et al. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects
Lister et al. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution
Storey et al. Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment
Rader et al. A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users
Olsen et al. Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users
Lister et al. An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Within-channel and across-channel gap detection
Holstad et al. Relation of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to behavioral T-and C-levels in children with cochlear implants
Zollweg et al. The efficacy of auditory integration training: A double blind study
Manning et al. Comparison of tinnitus loudness measures: matching, rating, and scaling
Hazan et al. Home-Based Audiometry With a Smartphone App: Reliable Results?
Bräcker et al. Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part II: Measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with a hearing implant
Özses et al. Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire
Henry et al. Computer-automated clinical technique for tinnitus quantification
Mineau et al. Threshold measurement for patients with tinnitus: Pulsed or continuous tones
Kessler et al. Clinical application of spectral modulation detection: speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid
Lovett et al. Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment
Cherry et al. Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children
TW200932195A (en) Audiometry and screening system, and method thereof
Gordon-Hickey et al. Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level
Kuk et al. Performance of older normal-hearing listeners on the tracking of noise tolerance (TNT) test
Ellis et al. Measurements of loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands for children and adults with normal hearing