Burk et al., 2004 - Google Patents
Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometryBurk et al., 2004
View PDF- Document ID
- 13699517139533596387
- Author
- Burk M
- Wiley T
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
The purpose of this study was to compare auditory thresholds obtained for continuous and pulsed tones in listeners with normal hearing. Auditory thresholds, test—retest reliability, falsepositive responses, and listener preference were compared for both signals. Hearing …
- 208000009205 Tinnitus 0 abstract description 17
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
- A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
- A61B5/04845—Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/165—Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6814—Head
- A61B5/6815—Ear
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Wilson et al. | An evaluation of the BKB-SIN, HINT, QuickSIN, and WIN materials on listeners with normal hearing and listeners with hearing loss | |
Burk et al. | Continuous versus pulsed tones in audiometry | |
Eikelboom et al. | Clinical validation of the AMTAS automated audiometer | |
Margolis et al. | AMTAS®: Automated method for testing auditory sensitivity: III. Sensorineural hearing loss and air-bone gaps | |
Lister et al. | An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: age effects | |
Lister et al. | An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution | |
Storey et al. | Ambient noise impact on accuracy of automated hearing assessment | |
Rader et al. | A method for determining precise electrical hearing thresholds in cochlear implant users | |
Olsen et al. | Acceptable noise level (ANL) with Danish and non-semantic speech materials in adult hearing-aid users | |
Lister et al. | An adaptive clinical test of temporal resolution: Within-channel and across-channel gap detection | |
Holstad et al. | Relation of electrically evoked compound action potential thresholds to behavioral T-and C-levels in children with cochlear implants | |
Zollweg et al. | The efficacy of auditory integration training: A double blind study | |
Manning et al. | Comparison of tinnitus loudness measures: matching, rating, and scaling | |
Hazan et al. | Home-Based Audiometry With a Smartphone App: Reliable Results? | |
Bräcker et al. | Introducing real-life listening features into the clinical test environment: Part II: Measuring the hearing performance and evaluating the listening effort of individuals with a hearing implant | |
Özses et al. | Validity and reliability of Turkish version of the Auditory Behavior in Everyday Life Questionnaire | |
Henry et al. | Computer-automated clinical technique for tinnitus quantification | |
Mineau et al. | Threshold measurement for patients with tinnitus: Pulsed or continuous tones | |
Kessler et al. | Clinical application of spectral modulation detection: speech recognition benefit for combining a cochlear implant and contralateral hearing aid | |
Lovett et al. | Test-retest reliability of the Toy Discrimination Test with a masker of noise or babble in children with hearing impairment | |
Cherry et al. | Comparing monotic and diotic selective auditory attention abilities in children | |
TW200932195A (en) | Audiometry and screening system, and method thereof | |
Gordon-Hickey et al. | Intertester reliability of the acceptable noise level | |
Kuk et al. | Performance of older normal-hearing listeners on the tracking of noise tolerance (TNT) test | |
Ellis et al. | Measurements of loudness growth in 1/2-octave bands for children and adults with normal hearing |