Panteli et al., 2011 - Google Patents
Impact of SIPS performance on power systems integrityPanteli et al., 2011
- Document ID
- 1352637653767934069
- Author
- Panteli M
- Crossley P
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 2011 International Conference on Advanced Power System Automation and Protection
External Links
Snippet
An increasing number of utilities are using System Integrity Protection Schemes (SIPS) to minimize the probability of large disturbances and to enhance power system reliability. This trend leads to the use of an increased number of SIPS resulting in additional risks to system …
- 230000001965 increased 0 abstract description 16
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
- G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
- G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
- G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Tamronglak et al. | Anatomy of power system blackouts: preventive relaying strategies | |
Billinton et al. | Determination of the optimum routine test and self-checking intervals in protective relaying using a reliability model | |
Fu et al. | Risk assessment for special protection systems | |
Brown et al. | Modeling the impact of substations on distribution reliability | |
Panteli et al. | Quantifying the reliability level of system integrity protection schemes | |
Schweitzer et al. | Line protection: Redundancy, reliability, and affordability | |
Liu et al. | Assessing the risk of implementing system integrity protection schemes in a power system with significant wind integration | |
KR101545513B1 (en) | System for testing of digital protective relay for main power facility on nuclear power plant, and operation method of said system | |
Calvo et al. | Incorporating failures of system protection schemes into power system operation | |
Etemadi et al. | New considerations in modern protection system quantitative reliability assessment | |
Panteli et al. | Impact of SIPS performance on power systems integrity | |
Faza et al. | Integrated cyber-physical fault injection for reliability analysis of the smart grid | |
Albinali et al. | A centralized substation protection scheme that detects hidden failures | |
Miller et al. | PacifiCorp’s Jim Bridger RAS: A dual triple modular redundant case study | |
Hasan et al. | A simulation testbed for cascade analysis | |
Falahati et al. | Evaluating the differences between direct and indirect interdependencies and their impact on reliability in cyber-power networks | |
Ramabhotla et al. | Reliability optimization using fault tree analysis in the grid connected mode of microgrid | |
Sykes et al. | IEEE/PES PSRC report on design and testing of selected system integrity protection schemes | |
McGillis et al. | The process of system collapse based on areas of vulnerability | |
Bozchalui et al. | Composite system reliability evaluation incorporating protection system failures | |
Damchi et al. | Considering failure probability for back-up relay in determination of the optimum routine test interval in protective system using Markov model | |
JP2023103604A (en) | Plant monitoring system and plant monitoring device | |
Genz et al. | Test the Right Stuff: Using Data to Improve Relay Availability, Reduce Failures, and Optimize Test Intervals | |
Henneberg et al. | Reviewing the new IEEE C37. 250 Guide for Engineering, Implementation, and Management of System Integrity Protection Schemes | |
Samuel et al. | Fault tree-based reliability assessment of a 132-kv transmission line protection scheme |