[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Pelletier et al., 1991 - Google Patents

Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study

Pelletier et al., 1991

Document ID
13173761983991711320
Author
Pelletier L
Campbell S
Publication year
Publication venue
The Journal of prosthetic dentistry

External Links

Snippet

Articulators that program eccentric condylar pathways minimize occlusal adjustments of dental prostheses. This bench study compared three groups of methods for recording the immediate Bennett shift and the protrusive condylar path of the mandible. The experimental …
Continue reading at www.sciencedirect.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C11/00—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings
    • A61C11/08—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator
    • A61C11/081—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator with adjusting means thereof
    • A61C11/082—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with means to secure dental casts to articulator with adjusting means thereof for rectilinear adjustment
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/045—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for recording mandibular movement, e.g. face bows
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C11/00—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings
    • A61C11/06—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with incisal guide
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C11/00—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings
    • A61C11/02—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings characterised by the arrangement, location or type of the hinge means; Articulators with pivots
    • A61C11/022—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings characterised by the arrangement, location or type of the hinge means; Articulators with pivots with two adjustable pivoting points, e.g. Argon-type articulators
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/12—Tools for fastening artificial teeth; Holders, clamps, or stands for artificial teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/08—Artificial teeth; Making same
    • A61C13/097—Artificial teeth; Making same characterised by occlusal profiles, i.e. chewing contact surfaces

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Pelletier et al. Comparison of condylar control settings using three methods: a bench study
Lepidi et al. Virtual articulators and virtual mounting procedures: where do we stand?
Keshvad et al. Comparison of the replicability of routinely used centric relation registration techniques
Weinberg An evaluation of basic articulators and their concepts: Part II. Arbitrary, positional, semi adjustable articulators
dos Santos Jr et al. Comparison of condylar guidance setting obtained from a wax record versus an extraoral tracing: a pilot study
Piehslinger et al. Computerized axiography: principles and methods
Celar et al. Accuracy of recording horizontal condylar inclination and Bennett angle with the Cadiax compact®
Weinberg An evaluation of basic articulators and their concepts: Part I. Basic concepts
Pröschel et al. Articulator-related registration--a simple concept for minimizing eccentric occlusal errors in the articulator.
US20130204600A1 (en) Virtual articulator
Yang et al. A novel technique to align the intraoral scans to the virtual articulator and set the patient‐specific sagittal condylar inclination
Ahangari et al. Evaluation of the Cadiax Compact® II accuracy in recording preadjusted condylar inclinations on fully adjustable articulator
Chang et al. An in vitro evaluation of the reliability and validity of an electronic pantograph by testing with five different articulators
Goldstein et al. Selecting a virtual articulator: An analysis of the factors available with mechanical articulators and their potential need for inclusion with virtual articulators
Azer et al. The patient-specific anatomical articulator
Li et al. Design of occlusal wear facets of fixed dental prostheses driven by personalized mandibular movement
Nigam et al. A clinical comparison of sagittal condylar inclination and Bennett angle derived from a conventional electronic tracking device and an optical jaw tracking device
Watanabe Use of personal computers for Gothic arch tracing: analysis and evaluation of horizontal mandibular positions with edentulous prosthesis
Zarbah Accuracy of cast articulation: A Literature Review
Azer Simulating mandibular movements and articulator design
C̆elar et al. Guided versus unguided mandibular movement for duplicating intraoral eccentric tooth contacts in the articulator
Boulos et al. The Bennett Angle: Clinical comparison of different recording methods
Boulos et al. The horizontal condylar inclination: Clinical comparison of different recording methods
Sutradhar et al. Uses, accuracy and limitations of semiadjustable articulators in dentistry: a systematic review
Balch Verification of the accuracy of electronic mandibular movement recording devices: An in vitro investigation