Fernández-Cuesta et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism?Fernández-Cuesta et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 12908529424007887546
- Author
- Fernández-Cuesta J
- Rodríguez-Ledesma N
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Folia Linguistica
External Links
Snippet
One of the most characteristic features of the grammar of the Lindisfarne Gospel gloss is the absence of the etymological-e inflection in the dative singular in the paradigm of the strong masculine and neuter declension (a-stems). Ross (1960: 38) already noted that endingless …
- 238000004445 quantitative analysis 0 abstract description 3
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2765—Recognition
- G06F17/277—Lexical analysis, e.g. tokenisation, collocates
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
- G06F17/27—Automatic analysis, e.g. parsing
- G06F17/2765—Recognition
- G06F17/2775—Phrasal analysis, e.g. finite state techniques, chunking
- G06F17/278—Named entity recognition
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Biber | Using computer-based text corpora to analyze the referential strategies of spoken and written texts | |
| Laleko | What is difficult about grammatical gender? Evidence from heritage Russian | |
| Vidhayasai et al. | Investigating th Use og Google Translate in | |
| Kudrinski et al. | Sumerograms and Akkadograms in Hittite: Ideograms, logograms, allograms, or heterograms? | |
| Bondi | Emphatics in academic discourse | |
| Cole | A native origin for Present-Day English they, their, them | |
| Fernández-Cuesta et al. | Reduced forms in the nominal morphology of the Lindisfarne Gospel Gloss. A case of accusative/dative syncretism? | |
| Mooijaart et al. | Yesterday’s words: contemporary, current and future lexicography | |
| Sims-Williams et al. | The loss of inflection as grammar complication: Evidence from Mainland Scandinavian | |
| Jang | Two types of question and existential quantification | |
| Kachru | Language variation and corpus linguistics | |
| Kopaczyk | Code-switching in the records of a Scottish brotherhood in early modern Poland-Lithuania | |
| González-Ruiz | Trying to see the wood despite the trees: A plain approach to legal translation | |
| Satthachai et al. | Deontic modality in English-Thai<? br?> legislative translation: A corpus-based study | |
| López Arroyo et al. | The use of-ing and-ndo forms in sales contracts: An English-Spanish contrastive analysis | |
| Haider et al. | Slavic languages are Type 3 languages: replies | |
| Stolk | Orthographic variation and register in the corpus of Greek documentary papyri (300 BCE-800 CE) | |
| Umar | The structure of idioms in Nigerian English: The effects indigenous Nigerian languages have had on English idioms in Nigeria | |
| Maziarz et al. | Lexicalisation of Polish and English word combinations: an empirical study | |
| Álvarez López et al. | Afro-Brazilian Cupópia: lexical and morphosyntactic features of a lexically driven in-group code | |
| Stolk | Scribal and phraseological variation in legal formulas: ὑπάρχω+ dative or genitive pronoun | |
| Wilhelm | Between Simplification and Complexification. German, Hungarian, Romanian Noun and Adjective Morphologies in Contact | |
| Weissweiler et al. | CaMEL: Case Marker Extraction without Labels | |
| Tavi et al. | Vocabulary-Based Classification and Contact-Induced Formation of Neologisms in Two Standard Varieties of Karelian | |
| Felice | Case alignment in Kabyle Amazigh |