Hsiao et al., 2013 - Google Patents
Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced framesHsiao et al., 2013
View PDF- Document ID
- 1283320724852657627
- Author
- Hsiao P
- Lehman D
- Roeder C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Earthquake engineering & structural dynamics
External Links
Snippet
Special concentrically braced frames (SCBFs) are commonly used for seismic design of buildings. Their large elastic stiffness and strength efficiently sustains the seismic demands during smaller, more frequent earthquakes. During large, infrequent earthquakes, SCBFs …
- 230000004044 response 0 title abstract description 42
Classifications
-
- E—FIXED CONSTRUCTIONS
- E04—BUILDING
- E04H—BUILDINGS OR LIKE STRUCTURES FOR PARTICULAR PURPOSES; SWIMMING OR SPLASH BATHS OR POOLS; MASTS; FENCING; TENTS OR CANOPIES, IN GENERAL
- E04H9/00—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate
- E04H9/02—Buildings, or groups of buildings, or shelters adapted to withstand or provide protection against abnormal external influences, e.g. war-like action, earthquake, extreme climate withstanding earthquake or sinking of ground
- E04H9/028—Earthquake withstanding shelters
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q40/00—Finance; Insurance; Tax strategies; Processing of corporate or income taxes
- G06Q40/02—Banking, e.g. interest calculation, credit approval, mortgages, home banking or on-line banking
- G06Q40/025—Credit processing or loan processing, e.g. risk analysis for mortgages
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Hsiao et al. | Evaluation of the response modification coefficient and collapse potential of special concentrically braced frames | |
Kitayama et al. | Probabilistic collapse resistance and residual drift assessment of buildings with fluidic self‐centering systems | |
Elkady et al. | Effect of gravity framing on the overstrength and collapse capacity of steel frame buildings with perimeter special moment frames | |
Ellingwood et al. | Risk‐benefit‐based design decisions for low‐probability/high consequence earthquake events in Mid‐America | |
Lignos et al. | A database in support of modeling of component deterioration for collapse prediction of steel frame structures | |
Wen | Reliability and performance-based design | |
Raghunandan et al. | Aftershock collapse vulnerability assessment of reinforced concrete frame structures | |
Shi et al. | Risk-based mainshock-aftershock performance assessment of SMA braced steel frames | |
Celik et al. | Seismic fragilities for non-ductile reinforced concrete frames–Role of aleatoric and epistemic uncertainties | |
Steele et al. | Dynamic and equivalent static procedures for capacity design of controlled rocking steel braced frames | |
Hsiao et al. | A model to simulate special concentrically braced frames beyond brace fracture | |
Han et al. | Seismic risk of base isolated non-ductile reinforced concrete buildings considering uncertainties and mainshock–aftershock sequences | |
Shin et al. | Seismic assessment of damaged piloti‐type RC building subjected to successive earthquakes | |
Jalayer et al. | Multi‐hazard upgrade decision making for critical infrastructure based on life‐cycle cost criteria | |
Tesfamariam et al. | Loss estimation for non‐ductile reinforced concrete building in Victoria, British Columbia, Canada: effects of mega‐thrust Mw9‐class subduction earthquakes and aftershocks | |
Shokrabadi et al. | Assessment of seismic risks in code conforming reinforced concrete frames | |
Burton et al. | Integrating visual damage simulation, virtual inspection, and collapse capacity to evaluate post‐earthquake structural safety of buildings | |
Malakoutian et al. | Quantification of linked column frame seismic performance factors for use in seismic design | |
Maleki et al. | Probabilistic seismic assessment of SMFs with drilled flange connections subjected to near-field ground motions | |
Mansouri et al. | Seismic Fragility Estimates of LRB Base Isolated Frames Using Performance‐Based Design | |
Shendkar et al. | Influence of Masonry Infill on Seismic Design Factors of Reinforced‐Concrete Buildings | |
Sadeghi et al. | Probabilistic seismic analysis of steel moment-resisting frame structure including a damaged column | |
Alam et al. | Probabilistic seismic demand assessment accounting for finite element model class uncertainty: Application to a code‐designed URM infilled reinforced concrete frame building | |
Kwag et al. | Beneficial and Detrimental Effects of Soil‐Structure Interaction on Probabilistic Seismic Hazard and Risk of Nuclear Power Plant | |
López-Barraza et al. | Reduction of maximum and residual drifts on posttensioned steel frames with semirigid connections |