[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Koster et al., 2004 - Google Patents

Does imminent threat capture and hold attention?

Koster et al., 2004

View PDF
Document ID
12194655237102721140
Author
Koster E
Crombez G
Van Damme S
Verschuere B
De Houwer J
Publication year
Publication venue
Emotion

External Links

Snippet

According to models of attention and emotion, threat captures and holds attention. In behavioral tasks, robust evidence has been found for attentional holding but not for attentional capture by threat. An important explanation for the absence of attentional capture …
Continue reading at www.academia.edu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
    • A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
    • A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
    • A61B5/164—Lie detection
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/10—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions
    • A61B3/12—Objective types, i.e. instruments for examining the eyes independent of the patients' perceptions or reactions for looking at the eye fundus, e.g. ophthalmoscopes
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B3/00—Apparatus for testing the eyes; Instruments for examining the eyes
    • A61B3/02—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient
    • A61B3/024—Subjective types, i.e. testing apparatus requiring the active assistance of the patient for determining the visual field, e.g. perimeter types
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
    • A61B5/4076—Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Koster et al. Does imminent threat capture and hold attention?
Faust et al. Inhibition of return and visuospatial attention in healthy older adults and individuals with dementia of the Alzheimer type.
Klotz et al. Motor activation without conscious discrimination in metacontrast masking.
De Gelder et al. Non-conscious recognition of affect in the absence of striate cortex
Moser et al. Enhanced attentional capture in trait anxiety.
Szczepanowski et al. Fear perception: can objective and subjective awareness measures be dissociated?
Rinck et al. Speeded detection and increased distraction in fear of spiders: evidence from eye movements.
Key et al. Same but different: 9‐month‐old infants at average and high risk for autism look at the same facial features but process them using different brain mechanisms
Helps et al. Altered spontaneous low frequency brain activity in attention deficit/hyperactivity disorder
Trivino et al. Rhythms can overcome temporal orienting deficit after right frontal damage
Levinson et al. Cortical and subcortical signatures of conscious object recognition
Busigny et al. Holistic processing impairment can be restricted to faces in acquired prosopagnosia: evidence from the global/local Navon effect
Correa et al. Temporal preparation, response inhibition and impulsivity
Koenig et al. Attentional bias for uncertain cues of shock in human fear conditioning: evidence for attentional learning theory
Hedger et al. Do emotional faces capture attention, and does this depend on awareness? Evidence from the visual probe paradigm.
Schankin et al. Contextual cueing effects despite spatially cued target locations
Lucas et al. Effects of emotional and non-emotional cues on visual search in neglect patients: Evidence for distinct sources of attentional guidance
di Pellegrino et al. Visual extinction as a spatio-temporal disorder of selective attention
Taylor et al. Fearful, but not angry, expressions diffuse attention to peripheral targets in an attentional blink paradigm.
Gauthier et al. Are Greebles like faces? Using the neuropsychological exception to test the rule
Winograd et al. The mere exposure effect in patients with Alzheimer's disease.
Wood et al. Covert orienting of visual spatial attention in attention deficit hyperactivity disorder: does comorbidity make a difference?
Ruggeri et al. Interindividual differences in brain dynamics of early visual processes: Impact on score accuracy in the mental rotation task
Straccia et al. Null results of oxytocin and vasopressin administration on mentalizing in a large fMRI sample: evidence from a randomized controlled trial
Nagy et al. Neural correlates of after-effects caused by adaptation to multiple face displays