Federman et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitorsFederman et al., 2008
- Document ID
- 11940395786771131914
- Author
- Federman J
- Ricketts T
- Publication year
External Links
Snippet
Purpose This study examined the impact that changing on-stage music and crowd noise levels during musical performance had on preferred listening levels (PLLs) and minimum acceptable listening levels (MALLs) across both floor and in-ear monitors. Method …
- 206010011879 Hearing loss 0 abstract description 18
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
- H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
- H04S7/301—Automatic calibration of stereophonic sound system, e.g. with test microphone
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04S—STEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
- H04S7/00—Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
- H04S7/30—Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
- H04S7/305—Electronic adaptation of stereophonic audio signals to reverberation of the listening space
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
- H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R5/00—Stereophonic arrangements
- H04R5/04—Circuit arrangements, e.g. for selective connection of amplifier inputs/outputs to loudspeakers, for loudspeaker detection, or for adaptation of settings to personal preferences or hearing impairments
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
- H04R2430/00—Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
- H04R2430/03—Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Croghan et al. | Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting | |
Moore et al. | Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing aids and paired comparisons | |
Croghan et al. | Music preferences with hearing aids: Effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics | |
Moore et al. | Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods | |
Arehart et al. | Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality | |
Kirchberger et al. | Dynamic range across music genres and the perception of dynamic compression in hearing-impaired listeners | |
Federman et al. | Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitors | |
Tan et al. | Perception of nonlinear distortion by hearing-impaired people | |
Ricketts et al. | Directional hearing aid benefit in listeners with severe hearing loss: Beneficio de los auxiliares auditivos direccionales en personas con hipoacusia severa | |
Curca et al. | Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features | |
Phillips et al. | Environmental factors in susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians | |
Culling et al. | The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment: La viabilidad del tamizaje audiométrico con lenguaje en ruido utilizando equipo doméstico de audio | |
Palmer et al. | Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgments | |
Mendes et al. | Acceptance of hearing protection aids in members of an instrumental and voice music band | |
Rosengard et al. | Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners | |
Adelman-Larsen et al. | Investigation on acceptable reverberation time at various frequency bands in halls that present amplified music | |
US20180116565A1 (en) | Method and Device for Administering a Hearing Test | |
Hockley et al. | Programming hearing instruments to make live music more enjoyable | |
Higgins et al. | A comparison between the first-fit settings of two multichannel digital signal-processing strategies: Music quality ratings and speech-in-noise scores | |
Warner et al. | Thresholds of Discomfort for Complex Stimuli | |
Johnson et al. | The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners | |
Tereping | Listener preference for concert sound levels: Do louder performances sound better? | |
Moore et al. | Effects of modified hearing aid fittings on loudness and tone quality for different acoustic scenes | |
Robotham et al. | The Effect of a Vertical Reflection on the Relationship between Preference and Perceived Change in Timbre and Spatial Attributes | |
Sataloff et al. | Hearing loss in singers and other musicians |