[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Federman et al., 2008 - Google Patents

Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitors

Federman et al., 2008

Document ID
11940395786771131914
Author
Federman J
Ricketts T
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

Purpose This study examined the impact that changing on-stage music and crowd noise levels during musical performance had on preferred listening levels (PLLs) and minimum acceptable listening levels (MALLs) across both floor and in-ear monitors. Method …
Continue reading at pubs.asha.org (other versions)

Classifications

    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04SSTEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
    • H04S7/00Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
    • H04S7/30Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
    • H04S7/301Automatic calibration of stereophonic sound system, e.g. with test microphone
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04SSTEREOPHONIC SYSTEMS
    • H04S7/00Indicating arrangements; Control arrangements, e.g. balance control
    • H04S7/30Control circuits for electronic adaptation of the sound field
    • H04S7/305Electronic adaptation of stereophonic audio signals to reverberation of the listening space
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R5/00Stereophonic arrangements
    • H04R5/04Circuit arrangements, e.g. for selective connection of amplifier inputs/outputs to loudspeakers, for loudspeaker detection, or for adaptation of settings to personal preferences or hearing impairments
    • HELECTRICITY
    • H04ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04RLOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R2430/00Signal processing covered by H04R, not provided for in its groups
    • H04R2430/03Synergistic effects of band splitting and sub-band processing
    • AHUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61BDIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Croghan et al. Quality and loudness judgments for music subjected to compression limiting
Moore et al. Determination of preferred parameters for multichannel compression using individually fitted simulated hearing aids and paired comparisons
Croghan et al. Music preferences with hearing aids: Effects of signal properties, compression settings, and listener characteristics
Moore et al. Comparison of the CAM2 and NAL-NL2 hearing aid fitting methods
Arehart et al. Effects of noise, nonlinear processing, and linear filtering on perceived music quality
Kirchberger et al. Dynamic range across music genres and the perception of dynamic compression in hearing-impaired listeners
Federman et al. Preferred and minimum acceptable listening levels for musicians while using floor and in-ear monitors
Tan et al. Perception of nonlinear distortion by hearing-impaired people
Ricketts et al. Directional hearing aid benefit in listeners with severe hearing loss: Beneficio de los auxiliares auditivos direccionales en personas con hipoacusia severa
Curca et al. Audiological outcome measures with the BONEBRIDGE transcutaneous bone conduction hearing implant: impact of noise, reverberation and signal processing features
Phillips et al. Environmental factors in susceptibility to noise-induced hearing loss in student musicians
Culling et al. The viability of speech-in-noise audiometric screening using domestic audio equipment: La viabilidad del tamizaje audiométrico con lenguaje en ruido utilizando equipo doméstico de audio
Palmer et al. Comparison of two hearing aid receiver-amplifier combinations using sound quality judgments
Mendes et al. Acceptance of hearing protection aids in members of an instrumental and voice music band
Rosengard et al. Effect of slow-acting wide dynamic range compression on measures of intelligibility and ratings of speech quality in simulated-loss listeners
Adelman-Larsen et al. Investigation on acceptable reverberation time at various frequency bands in halls that present amplified music
US20180116565A1 (en) Method and Device for Administering a Hearing Test
Hockley et al. Programming hearing instruments to make live music more enjoyable
Higgins et al. A comparison between the first-fit settings of two multichannel digital signal-processing strategies: Music quality ratings and speech-in-noise scores
Warner et al. Thresholds of Discomfort for Complex Stimuli
Johnson et al. The effect of extending high-frequency bandwidth on the acceptable noise level (ANL) of hearing-impaired listeners
Tereping Listener preference for concert sound levels: Do louder performances sound better?
Moore et al. Effects of modified hearing aid fittings on loudness and tone quality for different acoustic scenes
Robotham et al. The Effect of a Vertical Reflection on the Relationship between Preference and Perceived Change in Timbre and Spatial Attributes
Sataloff et al. Hearing loss in singers and other musicians