[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Makama et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Glove perforation rate in surgery: a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of double gloving

Makama et al., 2016

View PDF
Document ID
11733316982007030547
Author
Makama J
Okeme I
Makama E
Ameh E
Publication year
Publication venue
Surgical infections

External Links

Snippet

Background: The risk of exposure of either the patient or the surgeon to communicable disease when the surgical glove is perforated is important. Both patients and the surgical team need to be protected from this risk. Therefore, we intended to determine the efficacy of …
Continue reading at www.researchgate.net (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61L—METHODS OR APPARATUS FOR STERILISING MATERIALS OR OBJECTS IN GENERAL; DISINFECTION, STERILISATION, OR DEODORISATION OF AIR; CHEMICAL ASPECTS OF BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS, OR SURGICAL ARTICLES; MATERIALS FOR BANDAGES, DRESSINGS, ABSORBENT PADS, OR SURGICAL ARTICLES
    • A61L31/00—Materials for other surgical articles, e.g. stents, stent-grafts, shunts, surgical drapes, guide wires, materials for adhesion prevention, occluding devices, surgical gloves, tissue fixation devices
    • A61L31/04—Macromolecular materials
    • A61L31/041—Mixtures of macromolecular compounds
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61F—FILTERS IMPLANTABLE INTO BLOOD VESSELS; PROSTHESES; DEVICES PROVIDING PATENCY TO, OR PREVENTING COLLAPSING OF, TUBULAR STRUCTURES OF THE BODY, E.G. STENTS; ORTHOPAEDIC, NURSING OR CONTRACEPTIVE DEVICES; FOMENTATION; TREATMENT OR PROTECTION OF EYES OR EARS; BANDAGES, DRESSINGS OR ABSORBENT PADS; FIRST-AID KITS
    • A61F13/00—Bandages or dressings; Absorbent pads
    • A61F2013/00089—Wound bandages
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/322—Management of patient personal data, e.g. patient records, conversion of records or privacy aspects
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30—Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32—Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • G06F19/327—Management of hospital data, e.g. scheduling of medical staff or operation rooms, measuring the quality or efficiency of medical staff

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Makama et al. Glove perforation rate in surgery: a randomized, controlled study to evaluate the efficacy of double gloving
White et al. Blood contact and exposures among operating room personnel: a multicenter study
Thomas et al. Intraoperative glove perforation—single versus double gloving in protection against skin contamination
Kasatpibal et al. Prevalence and risk factors of needlestick injuries, sharps injuries, and blood and body fluid exposures among operating room nurses in Thailand
Jagger et al. A study of patterns and prevention of blood exposures in OR personnel
Rogers et al. Evaluation of interventions to prevent needlestick injuries in health care occupations
Tokars et al. Skin and mucous membrane contacts with blood during surgical procedures: risk and prevention
Stringer et al. Effectiveness of the hands-free technique in reducing operating theatre injuries
Korniewicz et al. Exploring the benefits of double gloving during surgery
Kuroyanagi et al. Risk of surgical glove perforation in oral and maxillofacial surgery
de Oliveira et al. Evaluation of surgical glove integrity during surgery in a Brazilian teaching hospital
Tlili et al. Evaluation of surgical glove integrity and factors associated with glove defect
Lynch et al. Perioperative blood contact and exposures: a comparison of incident reports and focused studies
Oliveira et al. Evaluation of adherence to measures for the prevention of surgical site infections by the surgical team
Christiana et al. Outcome of nurse-led intervention on knowledge and practice of aseptic technique among surgical nurses in two teaching hospitals in Lagos State, Nigeria
Twomey Double gloving: a risk reduction strategy
Basak et al. Comparison of surgical gloves: perforation, satisfaction and manual dexterity
White et al. Blood contacts in the operating room after hospital-specific data analysis and action
Rewri et al. Practice pattern of cataract surgeons when operating on seropositive patients
Vergilio et al. The risk of exposure of third-year surgical clerks to human immunodeficiency virus in the operating room
Ofili et al. Hospital workers' opinions on the predisposing factors to blood-related work accidents in Central Hospital, Benin City, Edo State, Nigeria
Phillips The comparison of double gloving to single gloving in the theatre environment
Ronak Knowledge about infection control measures among nurses at Hawler Teaching Hospital in Erbil city
Bebbington et al. The use of a surgical assist device to reduce glove perforations in postdelivery vaginal repair: a randomized controlled trial
Graves et al. The changing face of hand protection