Hood et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Demonstration of enhanced bioremediation in a TCE source area at Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Force StationHood et al., 2008
View PDF- Document ID
- 11219359799546369491
- Author
- Hood E
- Major D
- Quinn J
- Yoon W
- Gavaskar A
- Edwards E
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Groundwater Monitoring & Remediation
External Links
Snippet
The ability of bioremediation to treat a source area containing trichloroethene (TCE) present as dense nonaqueous phase liquid (DNAPL) was assessed through a laboratory study and a pilot test at Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Force Center. The results of …
- 229960002415 trichloroethylene 0 abstract description 99
Classifications
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINED SOIL SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/10—Reclamation of contaminated soil microbiologically, biologically or by using enzymes
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F2101/00—Nature of the contaminant
- C02F2101/30—Organic compounds
- C02F2101/32—Hydrocarbons, e.g. oil
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINED SOIL SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/08—Reclamation of contaminated soil chemically
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINED SOIL SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/002—Reclamation of contaminated soil involving in-situ ground water treatment
-
- B—PERFORMING OPERATIONS; TRANSPORTING
- B09—DISPOSAL OF SOLID WASTE; RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINED SOIL SOIL
- B09C—RECLAMATION OF CONTAMINATED SOIL
- B09C1/00—Reclamation of contaminated soil
- B09C1/02—Extraction using liquids, e.g. washing, leaching, flotation
-
- C—CHEMISTRY; METALLURGY
- C02—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F—TREATMENT OF WATER, WASTE WATER, SEWAGE, OR SLUDGE
- C02F3/00—Biological treatment of water, waste water, or sewage
- C02F3/02—Aerobic processes
- C02F3/12—Activated sludge processes
- C02F3/1205—Particular type of activated sludge processes
- C02F3/1231—Treatments of toxic sewage
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Hood et al. | Demonstration of enhanced bioremediation in a TCE source area at Launch Complex 34, Cape Canaveral Air Force Station | |
| Lippincott et al. | Bioaugmentation and propane biosparging for in situ biodegradation of 1, 4‐dioxane | |
| Christ et al. | Coupling aggressive mass removal with microbial reductive dechlorination for remediation of DNAPL source zones: a review and assessment | |
| Stroo et al. | Bioaugmentation for groundwater remediation | |
| Stroo | Bioremediation of chlorinated solvent plumes | |
| Boopathy | Anaerobic biodegradation of no. 2 diesel fuel in soil: a soil column study | |
| Lyon et al. | Bioaugmentation for groundwater remediation: an overview | |
| Scheutz et al. | Field evaluation of biological enhanced reductive dechlorination of chloroethenes in clayey till | |
| Lhotský et al. | Assessment of biodegradation potential at a site contaminated by a mixture of BTEX, chlorinated pollutants and pharmaceuticals using passive sampling methods–case study | |
| Di Gregorio et al. | Phytomediated biostimulation of the autochthonous bacterial community for the acceleration of the depletion of polycyclic aromatic hydrocarbons in contaminated sediments | |
| Wei et al. | Infiltration of sulfate to enhance sulfate‐reducing biodegradation of petroleum hydrocarbons | |
| Sutton et al. | Microbial dynamics during and after in situ chemical oxidation of chlorinated solvents | |
| Da Silva et al. | Comparison of bioaugmentation and biostimulation for the enhancement of dense nonaqueous phase liquid source zone bioremediation | |
| Sahl et al. | Coupling permanganate oxidation with microbial dechlorination of tetrachloroethene | |
| Höhener et al. | Methodology for the evaluation of engineered in situ bioremediation: lessons from a case study | |
| Butler et al. | Transformation of trichloroethylene to predominantly non‐regulated products under stimulated sulfate reducing conditions | |
| Scheutz et al. | Effects of bioaugmentation on enhanced reductive dechlorination of 1, 1, 1-trichloroethane in groundwater: a comparison of three sites | |
| Begley et al. | Oxygen and ethene biostimulation for a persistent dilute vinyl chloride plume | |
| Baldwin et al. | Bioremediation management reduces mass discharge at a chlorinated DNAPL site | |
| Chiu et al. | Evaluation of enhanced reductive dechlorination of trichloroethylene using gene analysis: pilot-scale study | |
| Botton et al. | Degradation of BTEX compounds under iron‐reducing conditions in contaminated aquifer microcosms | |
| Madison et al. | Increasing in situ bioremediation effectiveness through field-scale application of molecular biological tools | |
| Lu et al. | An innovative permeable reactive bio-barrier to remediate trichloroethene-contaminated groundwater: A field study | |
| Henry | Biostimulation for anaerobic bioremediation of chlorinated solvents | |
| Kuo et al. | Application of emulsified substrate biobarrier to remediate TCE-contaminated groundwater: Pilot-scale study |