Blackburn, 1998 - Google Patents
Using models for test generation and analysisBlackburn, 1998
- Document ID
- 11101701788354250018
- Author
- Blackburn M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 17th DASC. AIAA/IEEE/SAE. Digital Avionics Systems Conference. Proceedings (Cat. No. 98CH36267)
External Links
Snippet
Software testing will play a role in the development of software systems for some time to come. Although testing can account for 40 to 75 percent of the lifetime development and maintenance costs, the results summarized in this paper provide promising evidence that …
- 238000000034 method 0 description 11
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3668—Software testing
- G06F11/3672—Test management
- G06F11/3688—Test management for test execution, e.g. scheduling of test suites
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/362—Software debugging
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/36—Preventing errors by testing or debugging software
- G06F11/3664—Environments for testing or debugging software
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
- G06F11/22—Detection or location of defective computer hardware by testing during standby operation or during idle time, e.g. start-up testing
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F8/00—Arrangements for software engineering
- G06F8/70—Software maintenance or management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B17/00—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems
- G05B17/02—Systems involving the use of models or simulators of said systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
- G05B19/04—Programme control other than numerical control, i.e. in sequence controllers or logic controllers
- G05B19/05—Programmable logic controllers, e.g. simulating logic interconnections of signals according to ladder diagrams or function charts
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Thompson et al. | Specification-based prototyping for embedded systems | |
Lúcio et al. | Model transformation intents and their properties | |
Heitmeyer et al. | SCR: A toolset for specifying and analyzing software requirements | |
Konrad et al. | Real-time specification patterns | |
Stürmer et al. | Overview of existing safeguarding techniques for automatically generated code | |
Post et al. | Linking functional requirements and software verification | |
Blackburn | Using models for test generation and analysis | |
Bowen et al. | Formal methods | |
Bhatt et al. | Requirements-driven model checking and test generation for comprehensive verification | |
Heitmeyer | Formal methods for specifying, validating, and verifying requirements. | |
Sneed et al. | Comprehending a complex, distributed, object-oriented software system: A report from the field | |
Jetley et al. | Applying software engineering practices for development of industrial automation applications | |
US20230030253A1 (en) | Method for analyzing a programmable logic controller program | |
Pudlitz et al. | A lightweight multilevel markup language for connecting software requirements and simulations | |
MacColl et al. | Specification-based class testing: A case study | |
Khan et al. | A framework to specify system requirements using natural interpretation of UML/MARTE diagrams | |
Konrad et al. | Visualizing requirements in UML models | |
Ryser et al. | On the State of the Art in Requirements-based Validation and Test of Software | |
Son et al. | Development of a safety critical software requirements verification method with combined CPN and PVS: a nuclear power plant protection system application | |
Huang et al. | Prema: a tool for precise requirements editing, modeling and analysis | |
Schöpp et al. | Requirements-based code model checking | |
Kirby et al. | Applying formal methods to an information security device: An experience report | |
Burnard et al. | Verifying and validating automatically generated code | |
Rushby | Mechanizing formal methods: Opportunities and challenges | |
Niu et al. | Safety patterns for SysML: What does OMG specify? |