Huang, 2024 - Google Patents
Decentralized Social Networks and the Future of Free Speech OnlineHuang, 2024
View PDF- Document ID
- 11031276267111365540
- Author
- Huang T
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- arXiv preprint arXiv:2406.06934
External Links
Snippet
Decentralized social networks like Mastodon and BlueSky are trending topics that have drawn much attention and discussion in recent years. By devolving powers from the central node to the end users, decentralized social networks aim to cure existing pathologies on the …
- 238000013461 design 0 abstract description 99
Classifications
-
- H—ELECTRICITY
- H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
- H04L—TRANSMISSION OF DIGITAL INFORMATION, e.g. TELEGRAPHIC COMMUNICATION
- H04L67/00—Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications
- H04L67/30—Network-specific arrangements or communication protocols supporting networked applications involving profiles
- H04L67/306—User profiles
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Seering et al. | Moderator engagement and community development in the age of algorithms | |
| Floridi et al. | AI4People—an ethical framework for a good AI society: opportunities, risks, principles, and recommendations | |
| Carrasco et al. | Queer visibility: Supporting LGBT+ selective visibility on social media | |
| Adams et al. | The future of money and further applications of the blockchain | |
| Huang | Decentralized Social Networks and the Future of Free Speech Online | |
| Mavelli | Resilience beyond neoliberalism? Mystique of complexity, financial crises, and the reproduction of neoliberal life | |
| Buck et al. | I didn't sign up for your research study: The ethics of using “public” data | |
| Huang et al. | Personal data and privacy protection in online learning: Guidance for students, teachers and parents | |
| Risse | Artificial Intelligence and the Past, Present, and Future of Democracy. | |
| McDonald et al. | Responsible computing: A longitudinal study of a peer-led ethics learning framework | |
| Su | Emergence of cloud computing: an institutional innovation perspective | |
| Neyazi et al. | Understanding user interactions and perceptions of AI risk in Singapore | |
| Jabar et al. | Qualitative ethical technology assessment of artificial intelligence (AI) and the internet of things (IoT) among filipino Gen Z members: implications for ethics education in higher learning institutions | |
| van Steen | When choice is (not) an option: nudging and techno-regulation approaches to behavioural cybersecurity | |
| Jaquet-Chiffelle et al. | Virtual persons and identities | |
| Smith | Civil Society Organizations and the Global Response to HIV/AIDS | |
| Rowe et al. | Theoretical diversity in IS research: A causal structure framework | |
| Rawindaran | Legal Considerations and Ethical Challenges of Artificial Intelligence on Internet of Things and Smart Cities | |
| Palacios | A truly invisible hand: The critical value of Foucauldian irony | |
| McKee et al. | Digital media ethics and rhetoric | |
| Hartikainen | Malice in Wonderland: children, online safety and the wonderful world of Web 2.0 | |
| Marin et al. | Hic sunt leones. User orientation as a design principle for emerging institutions on social media platforms | |
| Livitckaia et al. | Decentralised social media | |
| Cate‐Carter et al. | Connected for health: Examining the use of a health‐related social media platform for children with chronic medical conditions | |
| Third et al. | Decentralised verification technologies and the web |