[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Calandruccio et al., 2017 - Google Patents

Effectiveness of two-talker maskers that differ in talker congruity and perceptual similarity to the target speech

Calandruccio et al., 2017

View HTML @Full View
Document ID
1108824577981695900
Author
Calandruccio L
Buss E
Bowdrie K
Publication year
Publication venue
Trends in Hearing

External Links

Snippet

Previous work has shown that masked-sentence recognition is particularly poor when the masker is composed of two competing talkers, a finding that is attributed to informational masking. Informational masking tends to be largest when the target and masker talkers are …
Continue reading at journals.sagepub.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L17/00—Speaker identification or verification
    • G10L17/26—Recognition of special voice characteristics, e.g. for use in lie detectors; Recognition of animal voices
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
    • G10L21/003—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants
    • G10L21/007—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants characterised by the process used
    • G10L21/013—Adapting to target pitch
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
    • G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
    • G10L21/0202—Applications
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00—Speech recognition
    • G10L15/08—Speech classification or search
    • G10L2015/088—Word spotting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L13/00—Speech synthesis; Text to speech systems
    • G10L13/02—Methods for producing synthetic speech; Speech synthesisers
    • G10L13/033—Voice editing, e.g. manipulating the voice of the synthesiser
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L15/00—Speech recognition
    • G10L15/08—Speech classification or search
    • G10L15/18—Speech classification or search using natural language modelling
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00
    • G10L25/48—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use
    • G10L25/51—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination
    • G10L25/66—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination for extracting parameters related to health condition
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L13/00—Speech synthesis; Text to speech systems
    • G10L13/06—Elementary speech units used in speech synthesisers; Concatenation rules
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/20—Handling natural language data
    • G06F17/28—Processing or translating of natural language

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Holmes et al. Familiar voices are more intelligible, even if they are not recognized as familiar
Johnsrude et al. Swinging at a cocktail party: Voice familiarity aids speech perception in the presence of a competing voice
MacPherson et al. Variations in the slope of the psychometric functions for speech intelligibility: A systematic survey
Lash et al. Expectation and entropy in spoken word recognition: Effects of age and hearing acuity
Ozimek et al. Polish sentence matrix test for speech intelligibility measurement in noise
Calandruccio et al. Effectiveness of two-talker maskers that differ in talker congruity and perceptual similarity to the target speech
Koeritzer et al. The impact of age, background noise, semantic ambiguity, and hearing loss on recognition memory for spoken sentences
Markham et al. The effect of talker-and listener-related factors on intelligibility for a real-word, open-set perception test
Brunnegård et al. Untrained listeners' ratings of speech disorders in a group with cleft palate: A comparison with speech and language pathologists ‚ratings
Trine et al. Extended high frequencies provide both spectral and temporal information to improve speech-in-speech recognition
Liu et al. Perception of a native vowel contrast by Dutch monolingual and bilingual infants: A bilingual perceptual lead
Hustad et al. Variability and diagnostic accuracy of speech intelligibility scores in children
Aydelott et al. Normal adult aging and the contextual influences affecting speech and meaningful sound perception
McCloy et al. Talker versus dialect effects on speech intelligibility: A symmetrical study
Nuesse et al. Measuring speech recognition with a matrix test using synthetic speech
Holmes et al. How long does it take for a voice to become familiar? Speech intelligibility and voice recognition are differentially sensitive to voice training
Fontan et al. Predicting speech perception in older listeners with sensorineural hearing loss using automatic speech recognition
Schlueter et al. Normal and time-compressed speech: How does learning affect speech recognition thresholds in noise?
Rotman et al. Rapid perceptual learning: A potential source of individual differences in speech perception under adverse conditions?
Morse-Fortier et al. The effects of musical training on speech detection in the presence of informational and energetic masking
Potter et al. Effect of vocal-pitch difference on automatic attention to voice changes in audio messages
Chen et al. Masking effects in the perception of multiple simultaneous talkers in normal-hearing and cochlear implant listeners
Gordon-Salant et al. Recognition of accented English in quiet by younger normal-hearing listeners and older listeners with normal-hearing and hearing loss
Hoyte et al. Components of speech prosody and their use in detection of syntactic structure by older adults
Ibelings et al. Speech recognition and listening effort of meaningful sentences using synthetic speech