Tafazzol et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Lumbopelvic rhythm during forward and backward sagittal trunk rotations: combined in vivo measurement with inertial tracking device and biomechanical modelingTafazzol et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 10208070319908546906
- Author
- Tafazzol A
- Arjmand N
- Shirazi-Adl A
- Parnianpour M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Clinical Biomechanics
External Links
Snippet
Background The ratio of total lumbar rotation over pelvic rotation (lumbopelvic rhythm) during trunk sagittal movement is essential to evaluate spinal loads and discriminate between low back pain and asymptomatic population. Methods Angular rotations of the …
- 230000033764 rhythmic process 0 title abstract description 26
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
- A61B5/1122—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement of movement trajectories
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
- A61B5/1116—Determining posture transitions
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
- A61B5/1036—Measuring load distribution, e.g. podologic studies
- A61B5/1038—Measuring plantar pressure during gait
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
- A61B5/4528—Joints
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6823—Trunk, e.g., chest, back, abdomen, hip
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/22—Ergometry; Measuring muscular strength or the force of a muscular blow
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Tafazzol et al. | Lumbopelvic rhythm during forward and backward sagittal trunk rotations: combined in vivo measurement with inertial tracking device and biomechanical modeling | |
Beaucage-Gauvreau et al. | Validation of an OpenSim full-body model with detailed lumbar spine for estimating lower lumbar spine loads during symmetric and asymmetric lifting tasks | |
Kingma et al. | Foot positioning instruction, initial vertical load position and lifting technique: effects on low back loading | |
Bassani et al. | Validation of the AnyBody full body musculoskeletal model in computing lumbar spine loads at L4L5 level | |
Kingma et al. | Supporting the upper body with the hand on the thigh reduces back loading during lifting | |
Hajibozorgi et al. | Sagittal range of motion of the thoracic spine using inertial tracking device and effect of measurement errors on model predictions | |
Dreischarf et al. | Estimation of loads on human lumbar spine: A review of in vivo and computational model studies | |
Arjmand et al. | Revised NIOSH Lifting Equation May generate spine loads exceeding recommended limits | |
US8523741B2 (en) | Method and system for monitoring sport related fitness by estimating muscle power and joint force of limbs | |
Requejo et al. | Upper extremity kinetics during Lofstrand crutch-assisted gait | |
Bachschmidt et al. | Walker-assisted gait in rehabilitation: a study of biomechanics and instrumentation | |
Schall Jr et al. | A comparison of instrumentation methods to estimate thoracolumbar motion in field-based occupational studies | |
Larsen et al. | Estimation of spinal loading during manual materials handling using inertial motion capture | |
Asadi et al. | Marker-less versus marker-based driven musculoskeletal models of the spine during static load-handling activities | |
Iwasaki et al. | Lumbar extension during stoop lifting is delayed by the load and hamstring tightness | |
Tsang et al. | The effects of bending speed on the lumbo-pelvic kinematics and movement pattern during forward bending in people with and without low back pain | |
Ranavolo et al. | Modelling the spine as a deformable body: Feasibility of reconstruction using an optoelectronic system | |
Lee et al. | 3D spinal motion analysis during staircase walking using an ambulatory inertial and magnetic sensing system | |
Bonnet et al. | A least-squares identification algorithm for estimating squat exercise mechanics using a single inertial measurement unit | |
Eskandari et al. | Subject-specific 2D/3D image registration and kinematics-driven musculoskeletal model of the spine | |
Beach et al. | FMS™ scores and low-back loading during lifting–whole-body movement screening as an ergonomic tool? | |
Dupeyron et al. | Precision of estimates of local stability of repetitive trunk movements | |
Mohammadi et al. | Comparison of trunk muscle forces, spinal loads and stability estimated by one stability-and three EMG-assisted optimization approaches | |
Ghasemi et al. | Spinal segment ranges of motion, movement coordination, and three-dimensional kinematics during occupational activities in normal-weight and obese individuals | |
Cimolin et al. | Computation of spatio-temporal parameters in level walking using a single inertial system in lean and obese adolescents |