Shu et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Test scenarios construction based on combinatorial testing strategy for automated vehiclesShu et al., 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 100059881271395181
- Author
- Shu H
- Lv H
- Liu K
- Yuan K
- Tang X
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- IEEE Access
External Links
Snippet
Scenario-based testing is an important verification and certification measure to evaluate the safety of automated vehicles. In view of the existing test scenario composition methods, which may miss some critical scenario problems that have low occurrence probability, we …
- 238000010276 construction 0 title description 22
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
- G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Feng et al. | Testing scenario library generation for connected and automated vehicles, part I: Methodology | |
| Tuncali et al. | Requirements-driven test generation for autonomous vehicles with machine learning components | |
| Ma et al. | Verification and validation methods for decision-making and planning of automated vehicles: A review | |
| Zhang et al. | Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: A systematic mapping study | |
| Nalic et al. | Scenario based testing of automated driving systems: A literature survey | |
| Khastgir et al. | Systems approach to creating test scenarios for automated driving systems | |
| Alghodhaifi et al. | Autonomous vehicle evaluation: A comprehensive survey on modeling and simulation approaches | |
| CN106874597B (en) | highway overtaking behavior decision method applied to automatic driving vehicle | |
| Lawitzky et al. | Interactive scene prediction for automotive applications | |
| Shu et al. | Test scenarios construction based on combinatorial testing strategy for automated vehicles | |
| Bussler et al. | Application of evolutionary algorithms and criticality metrics for the verification and validation of automated driving systems at urban intersections | |
| Fakhfakh et al. | Vehicle platooning systems: Review, classification and validation strategies | |
| Song et al. | Intersection two-vehicle crash scenario specification for automated vehicle safety evaluation using sequence analysis and Bayesian networks | |
| Hekmatnejad et al. | Search-based test-case generation by monitoring responsibility safety rules | |
| Hou et al. | Twin scenarios establishment for autonomous vehicle digital twin empowered sotif assessment | |
| Pang et al. | A Survey of Decision-Making Safety Assessment Methods for Autonomous Vehicles | |
| Neis et al. | Literature review on maneuver-based scenario description for automated driving simulations | |
| Su et al. | Integrated framework for test and evaluation of autonomous vehicles | |
| Souflas et al. | Virtual Verification of Decision Making and Motion Planning Functionalities for Automated Vehicles in Urban Edge Case Scenarios | |
| Chen et al. | Platoon separation strategy optimization method based on deep cognition of a driver’s behavior at signalized intersections | |
| Bäumler et al. | Report on validation of the stochastic traffic simulation (Part B) | |
| Yu | Risk measurement, risk entropy, and autonomous driving risk modeling | |
| Chien et al. | Method of selecting test scenarios for pedestrian forward looking pre-collision system evaluation | |
| Fehnker | Application of evolutionary algorithms to analyze criticality in urban traffic scenarios | |
| Zhang et al. | Finding critical scenarios for automated driving systems: The data extraction form |