Li et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Hey! preparing humans to do tasks in self-adaptive systemsLi et al., 2021
View PDF- Document ID
- 9979276594399009931
- Author
- Li N
- Cámara J
- Garlan D
- Schmerl B
- Jin Z
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- 2021 International Symposium on Software Engineering for Adaptive and Self-Managing Systems (SEAMS)
External Links
Snippet
Many self-adaptive systems benefit from human involvement, where human operators can complement the capabilities of systems (eg, by supervising decisions, or performing adaptations and tasks involving physical changes that cannot be automated). However …
- 241000282414 Homo sapiens 0 abstract description 126
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0631—Resource planning, allocation or scheduling for a business operation
- G06Q10/06316—Sequencing of tasks or work
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F9/00—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit
- G06F9/06—Arrangements for programme control, e.g. control unit using stored programme, i.e. using internal store of processing equipment to receive and retain programme
- G06F9/46—Multiprogramming arrangements
- G06F9/48—Programme initiating; Programme switching, e.g. by interrupt
- G06F9/4806—Task transfer initiation or dispatching
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
- G06N5/04—Inference methods or devices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B19/00—Programme-control systems
- G05B19/02—Programme-control systems electric
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
- G05B2219/30—Nc systems
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0265—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric the criterion being a learning criterion
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Li et al. | Hey! preparing humans to do tasks in self-adaptive systems | |
Pacaux-Lemoine et al. | Designing intelligent manufacturing systems through Human-Machine Cooperation principles: A human-centered approach | |
Chen et al. | Supervisory control of multiple robots: Human-performance issues and user-interface design | |
Pacaux-Lemoine et al. | Designing human–system cooperation in industry 4.0 with cognitive work analysis: a first evaluation | |
Leitão et al. | A holonic approach to dynamic manufacturing scheduling | |
Donmez et al. | Modeling workload impact in multiple unmanned vehicle supervisory control | |
Sparrow et al. | Human Digital Twin for Integrating Human Workers in Industry | |
Wilkins et al. | Interactive execution monitoring of agent teams | |
Draper et al. | Intelligent multi-unmanned vehicle planner with adaptive collaborative/control technologies (IMPACT) | |
Sukthankar et al. | Intelligent agents as teammates | |
Cummings et al. | Holistic modelling for human-autonomous system interaction | |
Chiou et al. | Trust, shared understanding and locus of control in mixed-initiative robotic systems | |
Hollnagel | Modeling the orderliness of human action | |
Flores et al. | Human Cyber-Physical Systems: A skill-based correlation between humans and machines | |
Taylor et al. | A multi-modal intelligent user interface for supervisory control of unmanned platforms | |
D'Aniello et al. | An adaptive system based on situation awareness for goal-driven management in container terminals | |
Calhoun et al. | Enabling human-autonomy teaming with multi-unmanned vehicle control interfaces | |
Caccavale et al. | Plan execution and attentional regulations for flexible human-robot interaction | |
Baron et al. | Engineering-based approaches to human performance modeling | |
Paté‐Cornell | Preferences in AI algorithms: The need for relevant risk attitudes in automated decisions under uncertainties | |
Lange et al. | Task models for human-computer collaboration in supervisory control of teams of autonomous systems | |
Innocenti | A multi-agent architecture with distributed coordination for an autonomous robot | |
Cannella et al. | A meta-cognitive architecture for planning in uncertain environments | |
Skubch et al. | Towards a Comprehensive Teamwork Model for Highly Dynamic Domains. | |
Lay et al. | Noticing brittleness, designing for resilience |