[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Charaziak et al., 2013 - Google Patents

Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning

Charaziak et al., 2013

View HTML
Document ID
914914078062466049
Author
Charaziak K
Souza P
Siegel J
Publication year
Publication venue
Journal of the Association for Research in Otolaryngology

External Links

Snippet

As shown by the work of Kemp and Chum in 1980, stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning curves (SFOAE STCs) have potential to objectively estimate behaviorally measured tuning curves. To date, this potential has not been tested. This study aims to do so …
Continue reading at www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
    • A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
    • A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
    • A61B5/04845—Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
    • A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
    • A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
    • A61B5/6814—Head
    • A61B5/6815—Ear
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7235—Details of waveform analysis
    • A61B5/7253—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms
    • A61B5/7257—Details of waveform analysis characterised by using transforms using Fourier transforms
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/48—Other medical applications
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/72—Signal processing specially adapted for physiological signals or for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/7225—Details of analog processing, e.g. isolation amplifier, gain or sensitivity adjustment, filtering, baseline or drift compensation

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Charaziak et al. Stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in humans: comparison to behavioral tuning
Mehraei et al. Auditory brainstem response latency in noise as a marker of cochlear synaptopathy
Ridley et al. Using thresholds in noise to identify hidden hearing loss in humans
Aoyagi et al. Reliability of 80-Hz amplitude-modulation-following response detected by phase coherence
Manley et al. Frequency selectivity of the human cochlea: Suppression tuning of spontaneous otoacoustic emissions
Rasetshwane et al. Latency of tone-burst-evoked auditory brain stem responses and otoacoustic emissions: Level, frequency, and rise-time effects
Kumar et al. Test/retest repeatability of effect contralateral acoustic stimulation on the magnitudes of distortion product ototacoustic emissions
Dewey et al. Profiles of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions from 0.5 to 20 kHz in humans
Thorson et al. Reliability of distortion-product otoacoustic emissions and their relation to loudness
Kamerer et al. Reliability of measures intended to assess threshold-independent hearing disorders
Paul et al. Subcortical amplitude modulation encoding deficits suggest evidence of cochlear synaptopathy in normal-hearing 18–19 year olds with higher lifetime noise exposure
Charaziak et al. Estimating cochlear frequency selectivity with stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emissions in chinchillas
Chen et al. Stimulus frequency otoacoustic emissions evoked by swept tones
Brennan et al. Inherent envelope fluctuations in forward masking: Effects of age and hearing loss
Leschke et al. Auditory filter shapes derived from forward and simultaneous masking at low frequencies: Implications for human cochlear tuning
Gong et al. An objective assessment method for frequency selectivity of the human auditory system
Zelle et al. Derivation of input-output functions from distortion-product otoacoustic emission level maps
De Boer et al. The Allen-Fahey experiment extended
Sun Distortion product otoacoustic emission fine structure is responsible for variability of distortion product otoacoustic emission contralateral suppression
Strelcyk et al. Relation between derived-band auditory brainstem response latencies and behavioral frequency selectivity
Dewey et al. Effects of contralateral acoustic stimulation on spontaneous otoacoustic emissions and hearing threshold fine structure
Wojtczak et al. Recovery from on-and off-frequency forward masking in listeners with normal and impaired hearing
DeRoy Milvae et al. Psychoacoustic measurements of ipsilateral cochlear gain reduction as a function of signal frequency
Charaziak et al. Exploration of stimulus-frequency otoacoustic emission suppression tuning in hearing-impaired listeners
Poling et al. Individual differences in behavioral estimates of cochlear nonlinearities