[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

McShefferty et al., 2015 - Google Patents

The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio

McShefferty et al., 2015

View HTML @Full View
Document ID
8987868697407754708
Author
McShefferty D
Whitmer W
Akeroyd M
Publication year
Publication venue
Trends in hearing

External Links

Snippet

Just-noticeable differences (JNDs) have been measured for various features of sounds, but despite its importance to communication, there is no benchmark for what is a just-noticeable— and possibly meaningful—difference in speech-to-noise ratio (SNR). SNR plays a crucial …
Continue reading at journals.sagepub.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L17/00—Speaker identification or verification
    • G10L17/26—Recognition of special voice characteristics, e.g. for use in lie detectors; Recognition of animal voices
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
    • G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
    • G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00
    • G10L25/48—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use
    • G10L25/51—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination
    • G10L25/66—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination for extracting parameters related to health condition
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
McShefferty et al. The just-noticeable difference in speech-to-noise ratio
Sabin et al. Validation of a self-fitting method for over-the-counter hearing aids
Lopez-Poveda et al. Predictors of hearing-aid outcomes
Mueller et al. The effects of digital noise reduction on the acceptance of background noise
Johannesen et al. The influence of cochlear mechanical dysfunction, temporal processing deficits, and age on the intelligibility of audible speech in noise for hearing-impaired listeners
Füllgrabe et al. The association between the processing of binaural temporal-fine-structure information and audiometric threshold and age: a meta-analysis
McShefferty et al. The just-meaningful difference in speech-to-noise ratio
Bernstein et al. Spectrotemporal modulation sensitivity as a predictor of speech-reception performance in noise with hearing aids
Leensen et al. Speech-in-noise screening tests by internet, part 2: improving test sensitivity for noise-induced hearing loss
Nelson et al. Self-adjusted amplification parameters produce large between-subject variability and preserve speech intelligibility
Palmer et al. Amplification with digital noise reduction and the perception of annoying and aversive sounds
Füllgrabe et al. Evaluation of a method for determining binaural sensitivity to temporal fine structure (TFS-AF test) for older listeners with normal and impaired low-frequency hearing
Vermeire et al. Speech recognition in noise by younger and older adults: effects of age, hearing loss, and temporal resolution
Moore et al. Preferred compression speed for speech and music and its relationship to sensitivity to temporal fine structure
Schädler et al. Individual aided speech-recognition performance and predictions of benefit for listeners with impaired hearing employing FADE
Brown et al. Time-varying distortions of binaural information by bilateral hearing aids: effects of nonlinear frequency compression
Van Den Tillaart-Haverkate et al. The influence of noise reduction on speech intelligibility, response times to speech, and perceived listening effort in normal-hearing listeners
Zhao et al. Robust and efficient online auditory psychophysics
Goldsworthy et al. Psychoacoustic and phoneme identification measures in cochlear-implant and normal-hearing listeners
Caswell-Midwinter et al. Discrimination of gain increments in speech-shaped noises
Neher et al. Investigating differences in preferred noise reduction strength among hearing aid users
Blamey et al. Effectiveness of a teleaudiology approach to hearing aid fitting
Zirn et al. Perception of interaural phase differences with envelope and fine structure coding strategies in bilateral cochlear implant users
Rana et al. Bilateral versus unilateral cochlear implantation in adult listeners: Speech-on-speech masking and multitalker localization
Decruy et al. The self-assessed Békesy procedure: validation of a method to measure intelligibility of connected discourse