Herd et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Predicting metabolisable energy intake by free-ranging cattle using multiple short-term breath samples and applied to a pasture case-studyHerd et al., 2020
- Document ID
- 8865864807607743810
- Author
- Herd R
- Arthur P
- Hegarty R
- Bird-Gardiner T
- Donoghue K
- Velazco J
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Animal Production Science
External Links
Snippet
Context Research into improving feed efficiency by ruminant animals grazing pastures has historically been restrained by an inability to measure feed intake by large numbers of individual animals. Recent advances in portable breath measurement technology could be …
- 241000283690 Bos taurus 0 title abstract description 35
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/02—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups food
- G01N33/04—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups food dairy products
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/02—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups food
- G01N33/12—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups food meat; fish
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Manafiazar et al. | Repeatability and variability of short-term spot measurement of methane and carbon dioxide emissions from beef cattle using GreenFeed emissions monitoring system | |
Charmley et al. | A universal equation to predict methane production of forage-fed cattle in Australia | |
Wangchuk et al. | Comparison and reliability of techniques to estimate live cattle body weight | |
Connor et al. | Use of residual feed intake in Holsteins during early lactation shows potential to improve feed efficiency through genetic selection | |
Lancaster et al. | Phenotypic and genetic relationships of residual feed intake with performance and ultrasound carcass traits in Brangus heifers | |
Durunna et al. | Feed efficiency differences and reranking in beef steers fed grower and finisher diets | |
Knap | Breeding robust pigs | |
Moore et al. | Genetic and phenotypic relationships between insulin-like growth factor-I (IGF-I) and net feed intake, fat, and growth traits in Angus beef cattle | |
Nkrumah et al. | Genetic and phenotypic relationships of feeding behavior and temperament with performance, feed efficiency, ultrasound, and carcass merit of beef cattle | |
Brown et al. | Monitoring liveweight in sheep is a valuable management strategy: a review of available technologies | |
Wisnieski et al. | Predictive modeling of bovine respiratory disease outcomes in feedlot cattle: A narrative review | |
Muir et al. | Sheep residual feed intake and feeding behaviour: are ‘nibblers’ or ‘binge eaters’ more efficient? | |
Jonker et al. | A meta-analysis comparing four measurement methods to determine the relationship between methane emissions and dry-matter intake in New Zealand dairy cattle | |
Bell et al. | Effect of breeding for milk yield, diet and management on enteric methane emissions from dairy cows | |
O'Neill et al. | Evaluation of the G raze I n model of grass dry‐matter intake and milk production prediction for dairy cows in temperate grass‐based production systems. 1–S ward characteristics and grazing management factors | |
Heard et al. | Calculating dry matter consumption of dairy herds in Australia: the need to fully account for energy requirements and issues with estimating energy supply | |
Kelly et al. | Large variability in feeding behavior among crossbred growing cattle | |
Caetano et al. | Energy relations in cattle can be quantified using open-circuit gas-quantification systems | |
Herd et al. | Predicting metabolisable energy intake by free-ranging cattle using multiple short-term breath samples and applied to a pasture case-study | |
Dressler et al. | Characterization of the number of spot samples required for quantification of gas fluxes and metabolic heat production from grazing beef cows using a GreenFeed | |
Manafiazar et al. | Methane and carbon dioxide emissions and grazed forage intake from pregnant beef heifers previously classified for residual feed intake under drylot conditions | |
Siberski–Cooper et al. | Associations of wearable sensor measures with feed intake, production traits, lactation, and environmental parameters impacting feed efficiency in dairy cattle | |
Morris et al. | Growth, feed intake and maternal performance of Angus heifers from high and low feed efficiency selection lines | |
Escobar-Bahamondes et al. | Estimating enteric methane production for beef cattle using empirical prediction models compared with IPCC Tier 2 methodology | |
Nguyen et al. | The sustainability index: a new tool to breed for reduced greenhouse-gas emissions intensity in Australian dairy cattle |