Crase et al., 2014 - Google Patents
Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate‐mediated range shiftsCrase et al., 2014
View PDF- Document ID
- 8761181960789809314
- Author
- Crase B
- Liedloff A
- Vesk P
- Fukuda Y
- Wintle B
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Global Change Biology
External Links
Snippet
Species distribution models (SDM s) are widely used to forecast changes in the spatial distributions of species and communities in response to climate change. However, spatial autocorrelation (SA) is rarely accounted for in these models, despite its ubiquity in broad …
- 241000894007 species 0 title abstract description 51
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30286—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor in structured data stores
- G06F17/30587—Details of specialised database models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
- G06Q10/0639—Performance analysis
- G06Q10/06393—Score-carding, benchmarking or key performance indicator [KPI] analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/10—Office automation, e.g. computer aided management of electronic mail or groupware; Time management, e.g. calendars, reminders, meetings or time accounting
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Crase et al. | Incorporating spatial autocorrelation into species distribution models alters forecasts of climate‐mediated range shifts | |
Hällfors et al. | Addressing potential local adaptation in species distribution models: implications for conservation under climate change | |
Abrahms et al. | Dynamic ensemble models to predict distributions and anthropogenic risk exposure for highly mobile species | |
Mellin et al. | Spatial resilience of the Great Barrier Reef under cumulative disturbance impacts | |
Braunisch et al. | Selecting from correlated climate variables: a major source of uncertainty for predicting species distributions under climate change | |
Crall et al. | Using habitat suitability models to target invasive plant species surveys | |
Sittaro et al. | Tree range expansion in eastern North America fails to keep pace with climate warming at northern range limits | |
Dobrowski et al. | Modeling plant ranges over 75 years of climate change in California, USA: temporal transferability and species traits | |
Brun et al. | The predictive skill of species distribution models for plankton in a changing climate | |
Harrigan et al. | A continental risk assessment of West Nile virus under climate change | |
Estes et al. | Comparing mechanistic and empirical model projections of crop suitability and productivity: implications for ecological forecasting | |
Dobrovolski et al. | Climatic history and dispersal ability explain the relative importance of turnover and nestedness components of beta diversity | |
Crase et al. | A new method for dealing with residual spatial autocorrelation in species distribution models | |
Rebelo et al. | Ground validation of presence‐only modelling with rare species: a case study on barbastelles Barbastella barbastellus (Chiroptera: Vespertilionidae) | |
Carvalheiro et al. | Species richness declines and biotic homogenisation have slowed down for NW‐European pollinators and plants | |
Henriques-Silva et al. | A community of metacommunities: exploring patterns in species distributions across large geographical areas | |
Buisson et al. | Uncertainty in ensemble forecasting of species distribution | |
Webber et al. | Modelling horses for novel climate courses: insights from projecting potential distributions of native and alien Australian acacias with correlative and mechanistic models | |
Meddens et al. | Spatiotemporal patterns of unburned areas within fire perimeters in the northwestern United States from 1984 to 2014 | |
Rodríguez et al. | Integration of physiological knowledge into hybrid species distribution modelling to improve forecast of distributional shifts of tropical corals | |
Kelly et al. | Combining global climate and regional landscape models to improve prediction of invasion risk | |
Furniss et al. | Reconciling niches and neutrality in a subalpine temperate forest | |
Visser et al. | Environmental factors determining the phylogenetic structure of C4 grass communities | |
Thomas et al. | Low mortality in tall tropical trees | |
Torres‐Romero et al. | Untangling human and environmental effects on geographical gradients of mammal species richness: a global and regional evaluation |