Gray et al., 2016 - Google Patents
A qualitative narrative policy framework? Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reformGray et al., 2016
- Document ID
- 8735837942261455174
- Author
- Gray G
- Jones M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Public Policy and Administration
External Links
Snippet
In 2010, the narrative policy framework was introduced as a positivist, quantitative, and structuralist approach to the study of policy narratives. Deviating from this central tenet of the narrative policy framework, in this article we show that the framework is quite compatible …
- 230000001105 regulatory 0 title description 24
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Gray et al. | A qualitative narrative policy framework? Examining the policy narratives of US campaign finance regulatory reform | |
| Pezzuti et al. | Certainty in language increases consumer engagement on social media | |
| Beyers et al. | Lobbying makes (strange) bedfellows: explaining the formation and composition of lobbying coalitions in EU legislative politics | |
| Humprecht et al. | Hostile emotions in news comments: A cross-national analysis of Facebook discussions | |
| Osborne et al. | Authoritarianism and national identity: Examining the longitudinal effects of SDO and RWA on nationalism and patriotism | |
| Barros | Tools of legitimacy: The case of the Petrobras corporate blog | |
| Koliska et al. | Lügenpresse: The lying press and German journalists’ responses to a stigma | |
| Matthes | Framing politics: An integrative approach | |
| Jost et al. | Antecedents and consequences of system-justifying ideologies | |
| Gibson et al. | Why do people accept public policies they oppose? Testing legitimacy theory with a survey-based experiment | |
| Turner | Working smart and hard? Agency effort, judicial review, and policy precision | |
| Nasiritousi et al. | Normative arguments for non-state actor participation in international policymaking processes: Functionalism, neocorporatism or democratic pluralism? | |
| Ho et al. | Let’s nab fake science news: Predicting scientists’ support for interventions using the influence of presumed media influence model | |
| Cordonier et al. | Why are conspiracy theories more successful in some countries than in others? An exploratory study on Internet users from 22 Western and non-Western countries | |
| Keeves et al. | Those closest wield the sharpest knife: How ingratiation leads to resentment and social undermining of the CEO | |
| Naurin et al. | Asymmetric accountability: An experimental investigation of biases in evaluations of governments’ election pledges | |
| Slepian et al. | To whom do we confide our secrets? | |
| Cabrejas-Peñuelas et al. | Positive self-evaluation versus negative other-evaluation in the political genre of pre-election debates | |
| Ulbricht | Perceptions and conceptions of democracy: Applying thick concepts of democracy to reassess desires for democracy | |
| Bessner et al. | Nazism, neoliberalism, and the Trumpist challenge to democracy | |
| Kim et al. | Three motives for abusive supervision: The mitigating effect of subordinates attributed motives on abusive supervision’s negative outcomes | |
| Lundmark et al. | Unorganized atheism and the secular movement: Reddit as a site for studying ‘lived atheism’ | |
| Ruhs | Who cares what the people think? Public attitudes and refugee protection in Europe | |
| Mendes | Inclusion and political representation in peace negotiations: The case of the Colombian victims’ delegations | |
| Hopp et al. | Correlating self-report and trace data measures of incivility: A proof of concept |