Sokolov, 2016 - Google Patents
Adaptive stabilization of parameter-affine minimum-phase plants under Lipschitz uncertaintySokolov, 2016
- Document ID
- 8680638451505792908
- Author
- Sokolov V
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Automatica
External Links
Snippet
The maximum capability of feedback control for discrete-time systems under a nonparametric Lipschitz uncertainty was first established in Xie and Guo (2000) for the simplest dynamical control system. It was shown that the necessary and sufficient condition …
- 230000003044 adaptive 0 title abstract description 46
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/04—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators
- G05B13/042—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric involving the use of models or simulators in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
- G05B13/024—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a parameter or coefficient is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F7/00—Methods or arrangements for processing data by operating upon the order or content of the data handled
- G06F7/38—Methods or arrangements for performing computations using exclusively denominational number representation, e.g. using binary, ternary, decimal representation
- G06F7/48—Methods or arrangements for performing computations using exclusively denominational number representation, e.g. using binary, ternary, decimal representation using non-contact-making devices, e.g. tube, solid state device; using unspecified devices
- G06F7/4806—Computations with complex numbers
- G06F7/4818—Computations with complex numbers using coordinate rotation digital computer [CORDIC]
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
- G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
- G05B13/00—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion
- G05B13/02—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric
- G05B13/0205—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system
- G05B13/021—Adaptive control systems, i.e. systems automatically adjusting themselves to have a performance which is optimum according to some preassigned criterion electric not using a model or a simulator of the controlled system in which a variable is automatically adjusted to optimise the performance
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G06N99/005—Learning machines, i.e. computer in which a programme is changed according to experience gained by the machine itself during a complete run
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Mayne et al. | Robust output feedback model predictive control of constrained linear systems | |
Sokolov | Adaptive stabilization of parameter-affine minimum-phase plants under Lipschitz uncertainty | |
Cagienard et al. | Move blocking strategies in receding horizon control | |
Edwards | A practical method for the design of sliding mode controllers using linear matrix inequalities | |
Hu et al. | Output feedback robust MPC for linear systems with norm-bounded model uncertainty and disturbance | |
Zhu et al. | Adaptive output feedback control for uncertain linear time-delay systems | |
Müller et al. | On the performance of economic model predictive control with self-tuning terminal cost | |
Liu et al. | Full‐complexity polytopic robust control invariant sets for uncertain linear discrete‐time systems | |
Hetel et al. | Variable structure control with generalized relays: A simple convex optimization approach | |
Reble et al. | Model predictive control of constrained non-linear time-delay systems | |
Kang et al. | A survey of observers for nonlinear dynamical systems | |
Chakrabarty et al. | Approximate dynamic programming for linear systems with state and input constraints | |
Primbs et al. | A framework for robustness analysis of constrained finite receding horizon control | |
Ping et al. | An observer‐based output feedback robust MPC approach for constrained LPV systems with bounded disturbance and noise | |
Danik et al. | The construction of stabilizing regulators sets for nonlinear control systems with the help of Padé approximations | |
Kim | Delay-dependent robust H∞ control for discrete-time uncertain singular systems with interval time-varying delays in state and control input | |
Sokolov | Adaptive l1 robust control for SISO systems | |
Ge et al. | Optimal control for unknown mean-field discrete-time system based on Q-Learning | |
Batmani | On the design of event‐triggered suboptimal controllers for nonlinear systems | |
Costanza et al. | Equations for the missing boundary values in the hamiltonian formulation of optimal control problems | |
He et al. | Optimized‐based stabilization of constrained nonlinear systems: a receding horizon approach | |
Tran et al. | Fixed‐Time Complex Modified Function Projective Lag Synchronization of Chaotic (Hyperchaotic) Complex Systems | |
Gürsoy-Demir et al. | A nonlinear disturbance observer-based adaptive integral sliding mode control for missile guidance system | |
Mozelli et al. | SOFC for TS fuzzy systems: Less conservative and local stabilization conditions | |
Sokolov | Adaptive stabilization of minimum-phase plant under Lipschitz uncertainty via Yakubovich's method of recurrent objective inequalities |