Suchomel et al., 2012 - Google Patents
Testing of the World Health Organization recommended formulations in their application as hygienic hand rubs and proposals for increased efficacySuchomel et al., 2012
View PDF- Document ID
- 8379987434943138789
- Author
- Suchomel M
- Kundi M
- Pittet D
- Weinlich M
- Rotter M
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- American journal of infection control
External Links
Snippet
BACKGROUND: In Central Europe, alcohol-based hand rubs have been the preferred choice for hand hygiene, whereas, in other countries, other preparations have been used that are based on other active agents. Recently, a move towards alcohol-based hand rubs …
- 239000000203 mixture 0 title abstract description 63
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/30—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds
- A61K8/33—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing oxygen
- A61K8/34—Alcohols
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/30—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds
- A61K8/33—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing oxygen
- A61K8/36—Carboxylic acids; Salts or anhydrides thereof
- A61K8/368—Carboxylic acids; Salts or anhydrides thereof with carboxyl groups directly bound to carbon atoms or aromatic rings
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/30—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds
- A61K8/40—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing nitrogen
- A61K8/41—Amines
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/30—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds
- A61K8/49—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing heterocyclic compounds
- A61K8/4906—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing heterocyclic compounds with one nitrogen as the only hetero atom
- A61K8/4926—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing heterocyclic compounds with one nitrogen as the only hetero atom having six membered rings
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/30—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds
- A61K8/33—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing organic compounds containing oxygen
- A61K8/38—Percompounds, e.g. peracids
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K8/00—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations
- A61K8/18—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition
- A61K8/96—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing material, or derivatives thereof of undetermined constitution
- A61K8/97—Cosmetic or similar toilet preparations characterised by the composition containing material, or derivatives thereof of undetermined constitution of vegetable origin, e.g. plant extracts
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Suchomel et al. | Testing of the World Health Organization recommended formulations in their application as hygienic hand rubs and proposals for increased efficacy | |
| Suchomel et al. | Ethanol in pre-surgical hand rubs: concentration and duration of application for achieving European Norm EN 12791 | |
| Suchomel et al. | Glycerol significantly decreases the three hour efficacy of alcohol-based surgical hand rubs | |
| Marchetti et al. | Evaluation of the bactericidal effect of five products for surgical hand disinfection according to prEN 12054 and prEN 12791 | |
| Eggers et al. | Bactericidal and virucidal activity of povidone-iodine and chlorhexidine gluconate cleansers in an in vivo hand hygiene clinical simulation study | |
| Harnoss et al. | Hand antisepsis without decreasing efficacy by shortening the rub-in time of alcohol-based handrubs to 15 seconds | |
| Rotter et al. | Methods to evaluate the microbicidal activities of hand-rub and hand-wash agents | |
| Suchomel et al. | Testing of the World Health Organization-recommended formulations for surgical hand preparation and proposals for increased efficacy | |
| Barbadoro et al. | In vivo comparative efficacy of three surgical hand preparation agents in reducing bacterial count | |
| Jensen et al. | Quantifying the effects of water temperature, soap volume, lather time, and antimicrobial soap as variables in the removal of Escherichia coli ATCC 11229 from hands | |
| Gupta et al. | Comparison of two alcohol-based surgical scrub solutions with an iodine-based scrub brush for presurgical antiseptic effectiveness in a community hospital | |
| Suchomel et al. | Influence of glycerol and an alternative humectant on the immediate and 3-hours bactericidal efficacies of two isopropanol-based antiseptics in laboratory experiments in vivo according to EN 12791 | |
| Howard et al. | New method for assessing hand disinfection shows that pre-operative alcohol/chlorhexidine rub is as effective as a traditional surgical scrub | |
| Messager et al. | Effectiveness of hand-cleansing formulations containing tea tree oil assessed ex vivo on human skin and in vivo with volunteers using European standard EN 1499 | |
| Goroncy-Bermes et al. | Impact of the amount of hand rub applied in hygienic hand disinfection on the reduction of microbial counts on hands | |
| Nicolay | Hand hygiene: an evidence-based review for surgeons | |
| López-Gigosos et al. | Evaluation of antimicrobial persistent activity of alcohol-based hand antiseptics against bacterial contamination | |
| Pires et al. | Antibacterial efficacy of handrubbing for 15 versus 30 seconds: EN 1500-based randomized experimental study with different loads of Staphylococcus aureus and Escherichia coli | |
| Kampf et al. | World Health Organization-recommended hand-rub formulations do not meet European efficacy requirements for surgical hand disinfection in five minutes | |
| Suchomel et al. | Surgical hand disinfection using alcohol: the effects of alcohol type, mode and duration of application | |
| West et al. | There is no additional bactericidal efficacy of Environmental Protection Agency–registered disinfectant towelettes after surface drying or beyond label contact time | |
| Hübner et al. | Determination of antiseptic efficacy of rubs on the forearm and consequences for surgical hand disinfection | |
| Barbut et al. | Comparison of the antibacterial efficacy and acceptability of an alcohol-based hand rinse with two alcohol-based hand gels during routine patient care | |
| Traore et al. | Comparison of in-vivo antibacterial activity of two skin disinfection procedures for insertion of peripheral catheters: povidone iodine versus chlorhexidine | |
| Messager et al. | Comparison of two in vivo and two ex vivo tests to assess the antibacterial activity of several antiseptics |