[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Lamár et al., 2013 - Google Patents

Average probability of failure of aperiodically operated devices

Lamár et al., 2013

View PDF
Document ID
8017397335427405984
Author
Lamár K
Neszveda J
Publication year
Publication venue
Acta Polytechnica Hungarica

External Links

Snippet

The aperiodically operated devices are typically non-operated or stored, usually in a powered-down state. The duration of being operated is much shorter than that of storage. These devices have to perform extremely reliably during usage, while the operation usually …
Continue reading at acta.uni-obuda.hu (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0218—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults
    • G05B23/0243—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterised by the fault detection method dealing with either existing or incipient faults model based detection method, e.g. first-principles knowledge model
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B23/00—Testing or monitoring of control systems or parts thereof
    • G05B23/02—Electric testing or monitoring
    • G05B23/0205—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults
    • G05B23/0259—Electric testing or monitoring by means of a monitoring system capable of detecting and responding to faults characterized by the response to fault detection
    • G05B23/0283—Predictive maintenance, e.g. involving the monitoring of a system and, based on the monitoring results, taking decisions on the maintenance schedule of the monitored system; Estimating remaining useful life [RUL]
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G05—CONTROLLING; REGULATING
    • G05B—CONTROL OR REGULATING SYSTEMS IN GENERAL; FUNCTIONAL ELEMENTS OF SUCH SYSTEMS; MONITORING OR TESTING ARRANGEMENTS FOR SUCH SYSTEMS OR ELEMENTS
    • G05B2219/00—Program-control systems
    • G05B2219/30—Nc systems
    • G05B2219/32—Operator till task planning
    • G05B2219/32234—Maintenance planning
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/50—Computer-aided design
    • G06F17/5009—Computer-aided design using simulation
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F11/00—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring
    • G06F11/07—Error detection; Error correction; Monitoring responding to the occurence of a fault, e.g. fault tolerance
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01R—MEASURING ELECTRIC VARIABLES; MEASURING MAGNETIC VARIABLES
    • G01R31/00—Arrangements for testing electric properties; Arrangements for locating electric faults; Arrangements for electrical testing characterised by what is being tested not provided for elsewhere

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Lamár et al. Average probability of failure of aperiodically operated devices
Zhang et al. A Wiener process model with dynamic covariate for degradation modeling and remaining useful life prediction
Dutuit et al. Probabilistic assessments in relationship with safety integrity levels by using fault trees
Raza et al. Modelling of predictive maintenance for a periodically inspected system
Asraful Haque et al. A logistic growth model for software reliability estimation considering uncertain factors
Roemer et al. Validation and verification of prognostic and health management technologies
Li et al. Reliability modeling of a series system with correlated or dependent component degradation processes
Yan et al. Two‐Stage Degradation Assessment and Prediction Method for Aircraft Engine Based on Data Fusion
Huang et al. A Condition Based Maintenance for System Subject to Competing Failure due to Degradation and Shock.
Catterson et al. Prognostics of transformer paper insulation using statistical particle filtering of on-line data
Eleftheroglou et al. Similarity learning hidden semi-Markov model for adaptive prognostics of composite structures
KR102694136B1 (en) Oil gas plant equipment failure prediction and diagnosis system based on artificial intelligence
US10157113B2 (en) Information processing device, analysis method, and recording medium
Sun et al. A zero-failure reliability demonstration approach based on degradation data
Kaur et al. Measures of a Series System's Reliability for One or Two Decimal Random Data Points
Escobet et al. A fault/anomaly system prognosis using a data-driven approach considering uncertainty
CN117977536A (en) Smart power grid load identification method
Kirschenmann et al. Decision dependent stochastic processes
Nijhawan et al. On development of change point based generalized SRGM for software with multiple releases
Pant et al. Modeling a sequentially inspected system prone to degradation and shocks
Solomentsev et al. A procedure for failures diagnostics of aviation radio equipment
Kostogryzov et al. Innovative management based on risks prediction
Zhang et al. A model for residual life prediction based on brownian motion in framework of similarity
Chimitova et al. Alternatives for Wiener and gamma degradation models: method of selection
Kumar et al. Gas turbine engine operational data analysis for anomaly detection: Statistical vs. neural network approach