[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Urbanski et al., 2021 - Google Patents

Toward a new evidence-based fitting paradigm for over-the-counter hearing aids

Urbanski et al., 2021

View PDF
Document ID
7306073278932963937
Author
Urbanski D
Hernandez H
Oleson J
Wu Y
Publication year
Publication venue
American Journal of Audiology

External Links

Snippet

Purpose This dual-aim study was intended to develop and validate a new fitting paradigm for over-the-counter (OTC) hearing aids. Aim 1 was undertaken to create a limited set of evidence-based preconfigured gain–frequency responses (“presets”) for use in OTC …
Continue reading at pubs.asha.org (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/70—Adaptation of deaf aid to hearing loss, e.g. initial electronic fitting
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
    • A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
    • H—ELECTRICITY
    • H04—ELECTRIC COMMUNICATION TECHNIQUE
    • H04R—LOUDSPEAKERS, MICROPHONES, GRAMOPHONE PICK-UPS OR LIKE ACOUSTIC ELECTROMECHANICAL TRANSDUCERS; DEAF-AID SETS; PUBLIC ADDRESS SYSTEMS
    • H04R25/00—Deaf-aid sets providing an auditory perception; Electric tinnitus maskers providing an auditory perception
    • H04R25/30—Monitoring or testing of hearing aids, e.g. functioning, settings, battery power
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Urbanski et al. Toward a new evidence-based fitting paradigm for over-the-counter hearing aids
Saunders et al. A randomized control trial: Supplementing hearing aid use with listening and communication enhancement (LACE) auditory training
Johnson et al. A comparison of two methods for measuring listening effort as part of an audiologic test battery
Johnson et al. Impact of hearing aid technology on outcomes in daily life II: Speech understanding and listening effort
Nelson et al. Self-adjusted amplification parameters produce large between-subject variability and preserve speech intelligibility
Jorgensen Verification and validation of hearing aids: Opportunity not an obstacle
Picou et al. The effects of directional processing on objective and subjective listening effort
Boothroyd et al. A “Goldilocks” approach to hearing-aid self-fitting: User interactions
Magnusson et al. Speech recognition in noise using bilateral open-fit hearing aids: The limited benefit of directional microphones and noise reduction
Boymans et al. Audiologist-driven versus patient-driven fine tuning of hearing instruments
Brody et al. A comparison of personal sound amplification products and hearing aids in ecologically relevant test environments
Picou et al. Evaluation of the effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech recognition and sound quality for adults with mild to moderate hearing loss
Mackersie et al. A “Goldilocks” approach to hearing aid self-fitting: Ear-canal output and speech intelligibility index
Franklin et al. The relationship between personality type and acceptable noise levels: A pilot study
Ching et al. A cross-over, double-blind comparison of the NAL-NL1 and the DSL v4. 1 prescriptions for children with mild to moderately severe hearing loss
McCreery et al. An evidence-based systematic review of frequency lowering in hearing aids for school-age children with hearing loss
Wong et al. Efficacy of a hearing aid noise reduction function
Wong Evidence on self-fitting hearing aids
Ching et al. Effect of variations in hearing-aid frequency response on real-life functional performance of children with severe or profound hearing loss
Holden et al. Postlingual adult performance in noise with HiRes 120 and ClearVoice Low, Medium, and High
Plyler et al. Effect of hearing aid technology level and individual characteristics on listener outcome measures
Wolfe et al. Evaluation of wideband frequency responses and non-linear frequency compression for children with mild to moderate high-frequency hearing loss
English et al. Fitting recommendations and clinical benefit associated with use of the NAL-NL2 hearing-aid prescription in Nucleus cochlear implant recipients
Perry et al. Listener factors explain little variability in self-adjusted hearing aid gain
Wagener et al. Effect of hearing aid directionality and remote microphone on speech intelligibility in complex listening situations