[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Susini et al., 2021 - Google Patents

Immunohistochemical evaluation of FGD3 expression: A new strong prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer

Susini et al., 2021

View HTML
Document ID
6966632130581784993
Author
Susini T
Saccardin G
Renda I
Giani M
Tartarotti E
Nori J
Vanzi E
Pasqualini E
Bianchi S
Publication year
Publication venue
Cancers

External Links

Snippet

Simple Summary Breast cancer is the most incident malignancy and the leading cause of oncological death among women. The recent advances in the treatment of this disease are due to the increasing ability to individualize therapy, in the so called “precision medicine” …
Continue reading at www.mdpi.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/53Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay
    • G01N33/574Immunoassay; Biospecific binding assay for cancer
    • G01N33/57407Specifically defined cancers
    • G01N33/57415Specifically defined cancers of breast
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N33/00Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
    • G01N33/48Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
    • G01N33/50Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
    • G01N33/5005Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/10Services
    • G06Q50/22Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F19/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific applications
    • G06F19/30Medical informatics, i.e. computer-based analysis or dissemination of patient or disease data
    • G06F19/32Medical data management, e.g. systems or protocols for archival or communication of medical images, computerised patient records or computerised general medical references
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q50/00Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
    • G06Q50/01Social networking
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N27/00Investigating or analysing materials by the use of electric, electro-chemical, or magnetic means
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2800/00Detection or diagnosis of diseases
    • GPHYSICS
    • G01MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01NINVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
    • G01N2333/00Assays involving biological materials from specific organisms or of a specific nature
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Raffenne et al. hENT1 testing in pancreatic ductal adenocarcinoma: are we ready? a multimodal evaluation of hENT1 status
Lacombe et al. Biomarkers of response to etoposide-platinum chemotherapy in patients with grade 3 neuroendocrine neoplasms
Gentry-Maharaj et al. Multi-marker longitudinal algorithms incorporating HE4 and CA125 in ovarian cancer screening of postmenopausal women
Palleschi et al. Ki67 and PR in patients treated with CDK4/6 inhibitors: a real-world experience
Hwang et al. Influence of androgen receptor on the prognosis of breast cancer
Chahoud et al. Prognostic significance of p16 and its relationship with human papillomavirus status in patients with penile squamous cell carcinoma: results of 5 years follow-up
Idel et al. EVI1 as a Marker for Lymph Node Metastasis in HNSCC
Kemi et al. Immune cell infiltrate and prognosis in gastric cancer
Fülöp et al. Prognostic impact of the neutrophil-to-lymphocyte and lymphocyte-to-monocyte ratio, in patients with rectal Cancer: a retrospective study of 1052 patients
Susini et al. Immunohistochemical evaluation of FGD3 expression: A new strong prognostic factor in invasive breast cancer
Cass et al. Automated quantitative analysis of p53, Cyclin D1, Ki67 and pERK expression in breast carcinoma does not differ from expert pathologist scoring and correlates with clinico-pathological characteristics
Erber et al. Reproducibility of mRNA-based testing of ESR1, PGR, ERBB2, and MKI67 expression in invasive breast cancer—A Europe-Wide External Quality Assessment
Erber et al. Molecular subtyping of invasive breast cancer using a PAM50-based multigene expression test-comparison with molecular-like subtyping by tumor grade/immunohistochemistry and influence on oncologist’s decision on systemic therapy in a real-world setting
Silva-Oliveira et al. Clinical significance of ARID1A and ANXA1 in HER-2 positive breast cancer
Giannoula et al. Dynamic risk stratification for predicting treatment response in differentiated thyroid cancer
Malainou et al. Estrogen-receptor-low-positive breast cancer: Pathological and clinical perspectives
Pizzimenti et al. BRAF-AXL-PD-L1 Signaling Axis as a Possible Biological Marker for RAI Treatment in the Thyroid Cancer ATA Intermediate Risk Category
Kang et al. Lymph Node Ratio Predicts Recurrence in Patients with Papillary Thyroid Carcinoma with Low Lymph Node Yield
Arslan et al. Breast cancer characteristics in the population of survivors participating in the world trade center environmental health center program 2002–2019
Troiano et al. Immunohistochemical analysis revealed a correlation between Musashi-2 and Cyclin-D1 expression in patients with oral squamous cells carcinoma
López-García et al. Low prevalence of HER2-positive breast carcinomas among screening detected breast cancers
Bademler et al. Clinical significance of serum membrane-bound mucin-2 levels in breast cancer
Hahn et al. Can molecular biomarkers help reduce the overtreatment of DCIS?
Miller et al. The prognostic and predictive value of sox2+ cell densities in patients treated for colorectal cancer
Stefanovic et al. The lack of evidence for an association between cancer biomarker conversion patterns and CTC-status in patients with metastatic breast cancer