Arıöz, 2012 - Google Patents
Eveloping Subject-Specific Hearing Loss Simulation to Apply Different Frequency Lowering Algorithms for the Enhancement of Sensorineural Hearing LossesArıöz, 2012
- Document ID
- 6559995878722705366
- Author
- Arıöz U
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- PQDT-Global
External Links
Snippet
The hearing and understanding problems of the people with high frequency hearing loss are covered within the scope of this thesis. For overcoming these problems, two main studies, developing hearing loss simulation (HLS) and applying new frequency lowering methods …
- 206010011878 Deafness 0 title abstract description 3
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/02—Speech enhancement, e.g. noise reduction or echo cancellation
- G10L21/0202—Applications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L25/00—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00
- G10L25/48—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use
- G10L25/51—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination
- G10L25/66—Speech or voice analysis techniques not restricted to a single one of groups G10L15/00-G10L21/00 specially adapted for particular use for comparison or discrimination for extracting parameters related to health condition
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L17/00—Speaker identification or verification
- G10L17/26—Recognition of special voice characteristics, e.g. for use in lie detectors; Recognition of animal voices
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G10—MUSICAL INSTRUMENTS; ACOUSTICS
- G10L—SPEECH ANALYSIS OR SYNTHESIS; SPEECH RECOGNITION; SPEECH OR VOICE PROCESSING; SPEECH OR AUDIO CODING OR DECODING
- G10L21/00—Processing of the speech or voice signal to produce another audible or non-audible signal, e.g. visual or tactile, in order to modify its quality or its intelligibility
- G10L21/003—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants
- G10L21/007—Changing voice quality, e.g. pitch or formants characterised by the process used
- G10L21/013—Adapting to target pitch
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Ching et al. | Speech recognition of hearing-impaired listeners: Predictions from audibility and the limited role of high-frequency amplification | |
McCreery et al. | Audibility-based predictions of speech recognition for children and adults with normal hearing | |
Chen et al. | Predicting the intelligibility of vocoded and wideband Mandarin Chinese | |
Liu et al. | Temporal properties in clear speech perception | |
Shrivastav | The use of an auditory model in predicting perceptual ratings of breathy voice quality | |
Easwar et al. | Evaluation of speech-evoked envelope following responses as an objective aided outcome measure: Effect of stimulus level, bandwidth, and amplification in adults with hearing loss | |
Pinczower et al. | Vocal projection in actors: the long-term average spectral features that distinguish comfortable acting voice from voicing with maximal projection in male actors | |
Poissant et al. | Effects of reverberation and masking on speech intelligibility in cochlear implant simulations | |
Hillock-Dunn et al. | Effects of nonlinear frequency compression on speech identification in children with hearing loss | |
Souza et al. | New perspectives on assessing amplification effects | |
Kates et al. | An overview of the HASPI and HASQI metrics for predicting speech intelligibility and speech quality for normal hearing, hearing loss, and hearing aids | |
Rhebergen et al. | The dynamic range of speech, compression, and its effect on the speech reception threshold in stationary and interrupted noise | |
Gaballah et al. | Objective and subjective speech quality assessment of amplification devices for patients with Parkinson’s disease | |
Mao et al. | Auditory perceptual efficacy of nonlinear frequency compression used in hearing aids: A review | |
Nudelman et al. | Voice biofeedback via bone conduction headphones: effects on acoustic voice parameters and self-reported vocal effort in individuals with voice disorders | |
Parida et al. | Underlying neural mechanisms of degraded speech intelligibility following noise-induced hearing loss: The importance of distorted tonotopy | |
Kuk et al. | Development of the ORCA nonsense syllable test | |
Langner et al. | Evaluation of an adaptive dynamic compensation system in cochlear implant listeners | |
Jürgens et al. | Prediction of consonant recognition in quiet for listeners with normal and impaired hearing using an auditory model | |
Stone et al. | A set of time-and-frequency-localized short-duration speech-like stimuli for assessing hearing-aid performance via cortical auditory-evoked potentials | |
Patro et al. | Semantic influences on the perception of degraded speech by individuals with cochlear implants | |
Niewiarowicz et al. | Speech intelligibility deterioration for normal hearing and hearing impaired patients with different types of tinnitus | |
Arıöz | Eveloping Subject-Specific Hearing Loss Simulation to Apply Different Frequency Lowering Algorithms for the Enhancement of Sensorineural Hearing Losses | |
Reuter et al. | Distortion product otoacoustic emission of symphony orchestra musicians before and after rehearsal | |
Korhonen et al. | Use of linear frequency transposition in simulated hearing loss |