[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Menezes Aguiar et al., 2012 - Google Patents

Comparative Evaluation of the Twisted File and Revo-S Rotary Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.

Menezes Aguiar et al., 2012

Document ID
6271668753479722977
Author
Menezes Aguiar C
Gomes Faria C
Cruz Câmara A
Frazão M
Publication year
Publication venue
Acta Stomatologica Croatica

External Links

Snippet

Purpose: The present study set out to determine the centering ability of the Twisted File™ rotary system compared with the Revo-S® rotary system by means of the cone beam computed tomography. Material and methods: Forty mesiobuccal canals of human maxillary …
Continue reading at search.ebscohost.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C7/00—Orthodontics, i.e. obtaining or maintaining the desired position of teeth, e.g. by straightening, evening, regulating, separating, or by correcting malocclusions
    • A61C7/12—Brackets; Arch wires; Combinations thereof; Accessories therefor
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B17/00—Surgical instruments, devices or methods, e.g. tourniquets
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
    • A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
    • A61K6/10—Compositions for taking dental impressions
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C3/00—Dental tools or instruments
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4538—Evaluating a particular part of the muscoloskeletal system or a particular medical condition
    • A61B5/4542—Evaluating the mouth, e.g. the jaw
    • A61B5/4547—Evaluating teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C2201/00—Material properties
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Guelzow et al. Comparative study of six rotary nickel–titanium systems and hand instrumentation for root canal preparation
Hashem et al. Geometric analysis of root canals prepared by four rotary NiTi shaping systems
Elnaghy et al. Evaluation of root canal transportation, centering ratio, and remaining dentin thickness associated with ProTaper Next instruments with and without glide path
Taşdemir et al. Canal preparation with Hero 642 rotary Ni–Ti instruments compared with stainless steel hand K‐file assessed using computed tomography
Paqué et al. Root canal preparation with Endo‐Eze AET: changes in root canal shape assessed by micro‐computed tomography
Moore et al. A micro‐computed tomographic evaluation of apical root canal preparation using three instrumentation techniques
Koçak et al. Comparison of ProTaper Next and HyFlex instruments on apical debris extrusion in curved canals
Kirchhoff et al. Glide path management with single-and multiple-instrument rotary systems in curved canals: a micro–computed tomographic study
Nabavizadeh et al. A comparison of apical transportation in severely curved canals induced by reciproc and BioRaCe systems
Razcha et al. Micro-computed tomographic evaluation of canal transportation and centering ability of 4 heat-treated nickel-titanium systems
Marchesan et al. Impacts of contracted endodontic cavities on primary root canal curvature parameters in mandibular molars
Bertrand et al. Curved molar root canal preparations using HERO 642 rotary nickel–titanium instruments
Saberi et al. Comparison of centring ability and transportation between four nickel titanium instrumentation techniques by micro‐computed tomography
Shivashankar et al. Computed tomography evaluation of canal transportation and volumetric changes in root canal dentin of curved canals using Mtwo, ProTaper and ProTaper Next rotary system-an in-vitro study
Shaheen et al. Shaping ability and buckling resistance of TruNatomy, WaveOne gold, and XP-Endo shaper single-file systems
Pedullà et al. Cutting efficiency of heat‐treated nickel–titanium single‐file systems at different incidence angles
Liu et al. Comparison of five single-file systems in the preparation of severely curved root canals: an ex vivo study
Costa et al. Effect of large instrument use on shaping ability and debris extrusion of rotary and reciprocating systems
Arias et al. Effect of gamma-ray sterilization on phase transformation behavior and fatigue resistance of contemporary nickel-titanium instruments
Menezes Aguiar et al. Comparative Evaluation of the Twisted File and Revo-S Rotary Systems Using Cone Beam Computed Tomography.
Kumar et al. Apical extrusion of debris in mesiobuccal root of maxillary molars with five rotary file systems
de Carvalho et al. Cleaning effectiveness of a reciprocating single-file and a conventional rotary instrumentation system
Kadhim et al. Comparison of root canal transportation and centering after instrumentation through conservative and traditional access cavities using different file systems: An: In vitro: Study
Kwak et al. Comparison of the effects from coronal pre‐flaring and glide‐path preparation on torque generation during root canal shaping procedure
Türker et al. Influence of a glide path on the dentinal crack formation of ProTaper Next system