Yeste et al., 2021 - Google Patents
Integrating outcrop and subsurface data to improve the predictability of geobodies distribution using a 3D training image: A case study of a Triassic Channel–Crevasse …Yeste et al., 2021
- Document ID
- 6024656541176050330
- Author
- Yeste L
- Palomino R
- Varela A
- McDougall N
- Viseras C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Marine and Petroleum Geology
External Links
Snippet
Fluvial sandstones deposited by high-sinuosity fluvial systems are one of the most complex reservoirs to predict and model with confidence, a reflection of both the geometries and complex distribution of the component geobodies. By integrating both analogue outcrop …
- 238000000034 method 0 abstract description 48
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/282—Application of seismic models, synthetic seismograms
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/66—Subsurface modeling
- G01V2210/665—Subsurface modeling using geostatistical modeling
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/60—Analysis
- G01V2210/61—Analysis by combining or comparing a seismic data set with other data
- G01V2210/614—Synthetically generated data
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/28—Processing seismic data, e.g. analysis, for interpretation, for correction
- G01V1/30—Analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
- G01V99/005—Geomodels or geomodelling, not related to particular measurements
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/12—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation operating with electromagnetic waves
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V11/00—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS prospecting or detecting by methods combining techniques covered by two or more of main groups G01V1/00 - G01V9/00
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V3/00—Electric or magnetic prospecting or detecting; Measuring magnetic field characteristics of the earth, e.g. declination, deviation
- G01V3/38—Processing data, e.g. for analysis, for interpretation, for correction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06T—IMAGE DATA PROCESSING OR GENERATION, IN GENERAL
- G06T17/00—Three dimensional [3D] modelling, e.g. data description of 3D objects
- G06T17/05—Geographic models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V5/00—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity
- G01V5/02—Prospecting or detecting by the use of nuclear radiation, e.g. of natural or induced radioactivity specially adapted for surface logging, e.g. from aircraft
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Sech et al. | Three-dimensional modeling of a shoreface-shelf parasequence reservoir analog: Part 1. Surface-based modeling to capture high-resolution facies architecture | |
Van Buchem et al. | Regional stratigraphic architecture and reservoir types of the Oligo-Miocene deposits in the Dezful Embayment (Asmari and Pabdeh Formations) SW Iran | |
Chapin et al. | Reservoir architecture of turbidite sheet sandstones in laterally extensive outcrops, Ross Formation, western Ireland | |
Pranter et al. | Static connectivity of fluvial sandstones in a lower coastal-plain setting: An example from the Upper Cretaceous lower Williams Fork Formation, Piceance Basin, Colorado | |
Pranter et al. | Sandstone-body dimensions in a lower coastal-plain depositional setting: lower Williams Fork Formation, Coal Canyon, Piceance Basin, Colorado | |
Adams et al. | Digital characterization of thrombolite-stromatolite reef distribution in a carbonate ramp system (terminal Proterozoic, Nama Group, Namibia) | |
Fabuel-Perez et al. | Integration of digital outcrop models (DOMs) and high resolution sedimentology–workflow and implications for geological modelling: Oukaimeden Sandstone Formation, High Atlas (Morocco) | |
Yeste et al. | Reservoir architecture and heterogeneity distribution in floodplain sandstones: key features in outcrop, core and wireline logs | |
Tercan et al. | Seam modeling and resource estimation in the coalfields of western Anatolia | |
Deveugle et al. | Characterization of stratigraphic architecture and its impact on fluid flow in a fluvial-dominated deltaic reservoir analog: Upper Cretaceous Ferron Sandstone Member, Utah | |
Siddiqui et al. | High resolution facies architecture and digital outcrop modeling of the Sandakan formation sandstone reservoir, Borneo: Implications for reservoir characterization and flow simulation | |
Yeste et al. | Integrating outcrop and subsurface data to improve the predictability of geobodies distribution using a 3D training image: A case study of a Triassic Channel–Crevasse-splay complex | |
Falivene et al. | Hierarchical geocellular facies modelling of a turbidite reservoir analogue from the Eocene of the Ainsa basin, NE Spain | |
Labourdette | Stratigraphy and static connectivity of braided fluvial deposits of the lower Escanilla Formation, south central Pyrenees, Spain | |
Colombera et al. | Seismic-driven geocellular modeling of fluvial meander-belt reservoirs using a rule-based method | |
Pringle et al. | Capturing stratigraphic and sedimentological complexity from submarine channel complex outcrops to digital 3D models, Karoo Basin, South Africa | |
Yin et al. | Characterization of marine shale in Western Hubei Province based on unmanned aerial vehicle oblique photographic data. | |
Mezni et al. | Combined geophysical–geological investigation for 3D geological modeling: case of the Jeffara reservoir systems, Medenine Basin, SE Tunisia | |
Sahoo et al. | Creating three-dimensional channel bodies in LiDAR-integrated outcrop characterization: A new approach for improved stratigraphic analysis | |
Ainsworth et al. | Predicting shallow marine reservoir heterogeneity using a high resolution mapping approach, Brigadier Formation, NWS, Australia | |
Morgan | Investigating the role of buried valley aquifer systems in the regional hydrogeology of the Central Peace Region in Northeast British Columbia | |
Abbaszadeh et al. | Integrated geostatistical reservoir characterization of turbidite sandstone deposits in Chicontepec Basin, Gulf of Mexico | |
Clark et al. | Fluvial architecture of the Burro Canyon Formation using unmanned aerial vehicle-based photogrammetry and outcrop-based modeling: Implications for reservoir performance, Escalante Canyon, southwestern Piceance Basin, Colorado | |
Doligez et al. | Advanced workflows for joint modelling of sedimentary facies and diagenetic overprint, impact on reservoir quality | |
Díaz-Molina et al. | Sedimentary facies and three-dimensional reconstructions of upper Oligocene meander belts from the Loranca Basin, Spain |