Ellis et al., 1999 - Google Patents
How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzlesEllis et al., 1999
- Document ID
- 5802946767260911658
- Author
- Ellis M
- Tuck C
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Crop protection
External Links
Snippet
Formation of sprays by five hydraulic nozzles (standard flat fan, pre-orifice, hollow cone, low- pressure and evenspray nozzles) were investigated in order to establish whether the proven effects of adjuvants on sprays from a standard flat fan nozzle are reproduced by other …
- 239000007921 spray 0 title abstract description 72
Similar Documents
| Publication | Publication Date | Title |
|---|---|---|
| Ellis et al. | How adjuvants influence spray formation with different hydraulic nozzles | |
| Dorr et al. | A comparison of initial spray characteristics produced by agricultural nozzles | |
| Miller et al. | Effects of formulation on spray nozzle performance for applications from ground-based boom sprayers | |
| Ellis et al. | The effect of some adjuvants on sprays produced by agricultural flat fan nozzles | |
| Nuyttens et al. | Influence of nozzle type and size on drift potential by means of different wind tunnel evaluation methods | |
| Stainier et al. | Droplet size spectra and drift effect of two phenmedipham formulations and four adjuvants mixtures | |
| US7665348B2 (en) | System and method for determining atomization characteristics of spray liquids | |
| Holloway et al. | Effects of some agricultural tank-mix adjuvants on the deposition efficiency of aqueous sprays on foliage | |
| Miranda-Fuentes et al. | Developing strategies to reduce spray drift in pneumatic spraying in vineyards: Assessment of the parameters affecting droplet size in pneumatic spraying | |
| US20100132439A1 (en) | System and method for determining atomization characteristics of spray liquids | |
| Murphy et al. | The effect of boom section and nozzle configuration on the risk of spray drift | |
| Combellack et al. | A comparison of the drift potential of a novel twin fluid nozzle with conventional low volume flat fan nozzles when using a range of adjuvants | |
| Hewitt | Spray optimization through application and liquid physical property variables–I | |
| Zhao et al. | Effects of tank‐mix adjuvants on physicochemical properties and dosage delivery at low dilution ratios for unmanned aerial vehicle application in paddy fields | |
| Fritz et al. | Effects of spray mixtures on droplet size under aerial application conditions and implications on drift | |
| Løfstrøm et al. | The OML-SprayDrift model for predicting pesticide drift and deposition from ground boom sprayers | |
| Haq et al. | Analysis of droplet spectra and spray recovery as a function of atomizer type and fluid physical properties | |
| Miller et al. | Adjuvant effects on spray characteristics and drift potential | |
| Hewitt | Adjuvant use for the management of pesticide drift, leaching and runoff | |
| Hoffmann et al. | CHARACTERIZATION OF TRUCK-MOUNTED ATOMIZATION EQUIPMENT TYPICALLY USED IN VECTOR CONTROL1 | |
| Xue et al. | Coordination of distinctive pesticide adjuvants and atomization nozzles on droplet spectrum evolution for spatial drift reduction | |
| Payne | Spray dispersal from aerial silvicultural glyphosate applications | |
| Miller | Spray drift | |
| Krishnan et al. | Effect of sprayer bounce and wind condition on spray pattern displacement of TJ60-8004 fan nozzles | |
| Wolf et al. | Calibration of greenhouse spray chambers—the importance of dynamic nozzle patternation |