[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Wintersberger et al., 2016 - Google Patents

Trust in technology as a safety aspect in highly automated driving

Wintersberger et al., 2016

View HTML @Full View
Document ID
5672821302958724855
Author
Wintersberger P
Riener A
Publication year
Publication venue
i-com

External Links

Snippet

Trust in technology is an important factor to be considered for safety-critical systems. Of particular interest today is the transport domain, as more and more complex information and assistance systems find their way into vehicles. Research in driving automation/automated …
Continue reading at www.degruyter.com (HTML) (other versions)

Classifications

    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F17/00Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
    • G06F17/30Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
    • G06F17/30861Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
    • G06F17/30864Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems
    • G06F17/30867Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems with filtering and personalisation
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F3/00Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
    • G06F3/01Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06FELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
    • G06F21/00Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q30/00Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
    • G06Q30/02Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N5/00Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06NCOMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
    • G06N99/00Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
    • GPHYSICS
    • G06COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
    • G06QDATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G06Q10/00Administration; Management

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Kraus et al. The more you know: trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency
Körber et al. Why do I have to drive now? Post hoc explanations of takeover requests
Wintersberger et al. Trust in technology as a safety aspect in highly automated driving
Detjen et al. How to increase automated vehicles’ acceptance through in-vehicle interaction design: A review
Weaver et al. A systematic review and meta-analysis of takeover performance during conditionally automated driving
Lee et al. Exploring trust in self-driving vehicles through text analysis
Lee et al. Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude
Kim et al. Assessing distraction potential of augmented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers
Wandtner et al. Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving
Wintersberger et al. Let me finish before I take over: Towards attention aware device integration in highly automated vehicles
Niu et al. Anthropomorphizing information to enhance trust in autonomous vehicles
Gold et al. Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density
Gold et al. “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop?
Koo et al. Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance
Petermeijer et al. Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority
Wan et al. The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles
Vögel et al. Emotion-awareness for intelligent vehicle assistants: A research agenda
Nees et al. Speech auditory alerts promote memory for alerted events in a video-simulated self-driving car ride
Wintersberger et al. Evaluating feedback requirements for trust calibration in automated vehicles
McNabb et al. Staying connected on the road: a comparison of different types of smart phone use in a driving simulator
Graichen et al. Effects of gesture-based interaction on driving behavior: a driving simulator study using the projection-based vehicle-in-the-loop
Mara et al. Acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An overview of user-specific, car-specific and contextual determinants
Akalin et al. A taxonomy of factors influencing perceived safety in human–robot interaction
Braun et al. Identifying personality dimensions for characters of digital agents
Taylor et al. Reliable and transparent in-vehicle agents lead to higher behavioral trust in conditionally automated driving systems