Wintersberger et al., 2016 - Google Patents
Trust in technology as a safety aspect in highly automated drivingWintersberger et al., 2016
View HTML- Document ID
- 5672821302958724855
- Author
- Wintersberger P
- Riener A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- i-com
External Links
Snippet
Trust in technology is an important factor to be considered for safety-critical systems. Of particular interest today is the transport domain, as more and more complex information and assistance systems find their way into vehicles. Research in driving automation/automated …
- 238000005516 engineering process 0 title abstract description 30
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F17/00—Digital computing or data processing equipment or methods, specially adapted for specific functions
- G06F17/30—Information retrieval; Database structures therefor; File system structures therefor
- G06F17/30861—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers
- G06F17/30864—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems
- G06F17/30867—Retrieval from the Internet, e.g. browsers by querying, e.g. search engines or meta-search engines, crawling techniques, push systems with filtering and personalisation
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F3/00—Input arrangements for transferring data to be processed into a form capable of being handled by the computer; Output arrangements for transferring data from processing unit to output unit, e.g. interface arrangements
- G06F3/01—Input arrangements or combined input and output arrangements for interaction between user and computer
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06F—ELECTRICAL DIGITAL DATA PROCESSING
- G06F21/00—Security arrangements for protecting computers, components thereof, programs or data against unauthorised activity
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q30/00—Commerce, e.g. shopping or e-commerce
- G06Q30/02—Marketing, e.g. market research and analysis, surveying, promotions, advertising, buyer profiling, customer management or rewards; Price estimation or determination
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N5/00—Computer systems utilising knowledge based models
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06N—COMPUTER SYSTEMS BASED ON SPECIFIC COMPUTATIONAL MODELS
- G06N99/00—Subject matter not provided for in other groups of this subclass
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Kraus et al. | The more you know: trust dynamics and calibration in highly automated driving and the effects of take-overs, system malfunction, and system transparency | |
Körber et al. | Why do I have to drive now? Post hoc explanations of takeover requests | |
Wintersberger et al. | Trust in technology as a safety aspect in highly automated driving | |
Detjen et al. | How to increase automated vehicles’ acceptance through in-vehicle interaction design: A review | |
Weaver et al. | A systematic review and meta-analysis of takeover performance during conditionally automated driving | |
Lee et al. | Exploring trust in self-driving vehicles through text analysis | |
Lee et al. | Assessing drivers’ trust of automated vehicle driving styles with a two-part mixed model of intervention tendency and magnitude | |
Kim et al. | Assessing distraction potential of augmented reality head-up displays for vehicle drivers | |
Wandtner et al. | Effects of non-driving related task modalities on takeover performance in highly automated driving | |
Wintersberger et al. | Let me finish before I take over: Towards attention aware device integration in highly automated vehicles | |
Niu et al. | Anthropomorphizing information to enhance trust in autonomous vehicles | |
Gold et al. | Taking over control from highly automated vehicles in complex traffic situations: The role of traffic density | |
Gold et al. | “Take over!” How long does it take to get the driver back into the loop? | |
Koo et al. | Why did my car just do that? Explaining semi-autonomous driving actions to improve driver understanding, trust, and performance | |
Petermeijer et al. | Should drivers be operating within an automation-free bandwidth? Evaluating haptic steering support systems with different levels of authority | |
Wan et al. | The effects of vibration patterns of take-over request and non-driving tasks on taking-over control of automated vehicles | |
Vögel et al. | Emotion-awareness for intelligent vehicle assistants: A research agenda | |
Nees et al. | Speech auditory alerts promote memory for alerted events in a video-simulated self-driving car ride | |
Wintersberger et al. | Evaluating feedback requirements for trust calibration in automated vehicles | |
McNabb et al. | Staying connected on the road: a comparison of different types of smart phone use in a driving simulator | |
Graichen et al. | Effects of gesture-based interaction on driving behavior: a driving simulator study using the projection-based vehicle-in-the-loop | |
Mara et al. | Acceptance of autonomous vehicles: An overview of user-specific, car-specific and contextual determinants | |
Akalin et al. | A taxonomy of factors influencing perceived safety in human–robot interaction | |
Braun et al. | Identifying personality dimensions for characters of digital agents | |
Taylor et al. | Reliable and transparent in-vehicle agents lead to higher behavioral trust in conditionally automated driving systems |