[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Mulcahy et al., 2000 - Google Patents

Measurement of misfit at the implant-prosthesis interface: an experimental method using a coordinate measuring machine.

Mulcahy et al., 2000

Document ID
5519282300965018851
Author
Mulcahy C
Sherriff M
Walter J
Fenlon M
Publication year
Publication venue
International Journal of Oral & Maxillofacial Implants

External Links

Snippet

Measurement of misfit at the implant-prosthesis interface is a difficult procedure. One factor common to all methods that attempt to measure 3-dimensional distortion to the micron level is the difficulty in providing verifiably consistent reference points between individual …
Continue reading at search.ebscohost.com (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C9/00—Impression cups, i.e. impression trays; Impression methods
    • A61C9/004—Means or methods for taking digitized impressions
    • A61C9/0046—Data acquisition means or methods
    • A61C9/0053—Optical means or methods, e.g. scanning the teeth by a laser or light beam
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
    • A61C13/0022—Blanks or green, unfinished dental restoration parts
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/045—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for recording mandibular movement, e.g. face bows
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
    • A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
    • A61C13/12—Tools for fastening artificial teeth; Holders, clamps, or stands for artificial teeth
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
    • A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
    • A61C1/082—Positioning or guiding, e.g. of drills
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
    • A61C11/00—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings
    • A61C11/06—Dental articulators, i.e. for simulating movement of the temporo-mandibular joints; Articulation forms or mouldings with incisal guide

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Jemt et al. Measuring fit at the implant prosthodontic interface
Örtorp et al. Comparisons of precision of fit between cast and CNC-milled titanium implant frameworks for the edentulous mandible.
Dutton et al. The effect different substrates have on the trueness and precision of eight different intraoral scanners
Jemt In vivo measurements of precision of fit involving implant-supported prostheses in the edentulous jaw.
Wong et al. Three‐dimensional accuracy of digital static interocclusal registration by three intraoral scanner systems
Restorations et al. The precision of fit of cast and milled full-arch implant-supported restorations
Abduo et al. Assessing the fit of implant fixed prostheses: a critical review.
Tan et al. Three-dimensional analysis of the casting accuracy of one-piece, osseointegrated implant-retained prostheses.
Jemt Three‐dimensional distortion of gold alloy castings and welded titanium frameworks. Measurements of the precision of fit between completed implant prostheses and the master casts in routine edentulous situations
Kohorst et al. Different CAD/CAM-processing routes for zirconia restorations: influence on fitting accuracy
Andersson et al. Accuracy of machine milling and spark erosion with a CAD/CAM system
Al-Fadda et al. A comparison of the accuracy of fit of 2 methods for fabricating implant-prosthodontic frameworks.
US10307227B2 (en) Methods for placing an implant analog in a physical model of the patient's mouth
Eliasson et al. The accuracy of an implant impression technique using digitally coded healing abutments
US7596287B2 (en) Method and device for the three-dimensional determination and digitization of a plaster-or positive-model
Örtorp et al. Photogrammetry and conventional impressions for recording implant positions: a comparative laboratory study
Garine et al. Measurement of the rotational misfit and implant-abutment gap of all-ceramic abutments.
Yee et al. Three‐dimensional static articulation accuracy of virtual models–part i: system trueness and precision
Mulcahy et al. Measurement of misfit at the implant-prosthesis interface: an experimental method using a coordinate measuring machine.
Holst et al. Digitizing implant position locators on master casts: comparison of a noncontact scanner and a contact-probe scanner.
Schmidt et al. A comparative clinical study on the transfer accuracy of conventional and digital implant impressions using a new reference key‐based method
Malaguti et al. Dimensional tolerances and assembly accuracy of dental implants and machined versus cast‐on abutments
Sierraalta et al. Precision of fit of titanium and cast implant frameworks using a new matching formula
Jeon et al. Trueness and precision of scanning abutment impressions and stone models according to dental CAD/CAM evaluation standards
JP4309402B2 (en) Implant superstructure manufacturing method