[go: up one dir, main page]
More Web Proxy on the site http://driver.im/

Maeda et al., 2018 - Google Patents

Assessing correlation of human response to vibration through vibrotactile threshold shift with vibration exposure determined on the subject

Maeda et al., 2018

View PDF
Document ID
5329609971595030149
Author
Maeda S
Taylor M
Anderson L
Mclaughlin J
Publication year

External Links

Snippet

Existing risk assessment methodologies are based on fixed tool vibration magnitude emission data and tool usage time. The research evaluates the relationship between vibration dose assessment on subjects using wearable sensors with temporary threshold …
Continue reading at napier-repository.worktribe.com (PDF) (other versions)

Classifications

    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1121—Determining geometric values, e.g. centre of rotation or angular range of movement
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/103—Detecting, measuring or recording devices for testing the shape, pattern, colour, size or movement of the body or parts thereof, for diagnostic purposes
    • A61B5/11—Measuring movement of the entire body or parts thereof, e.g. head or hand tremor, mobility of a limb
    • A61B5/1124—Determining motor skills
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/45—For evaluating or diagnosing the musculoskeletal system or teeth
    • A61B5/4528—Joints
    • A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
    • A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
    • A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
    • A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
    • A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
    • A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
    • A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
    • G—PHYSICS
    • G01—MEASURING; TESTING
    • G01M—TESTING STATIC OR DYNAMIC BALANCE OF MACHINES OR STRUCTURES; TESTING STRUCTURES OR APPARATUS NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
    • G01M7/00—Vibration-testing of structures; Shock-testing of structures
    • G01M7/08—Shock-testing

Similar Documents

Publication Publication Date Title
Maeda et al. Determination of hand-transmitted vibration risk on the human
Burström The influence of biodynamic factors on the mechanical impedance of the hand and arm
Dong et al. Distribution of mechanical impedance at the fingers and the palm of the human hand
Dong et al. Frequency weighting derived from power absorption of fingers–hand–arm system under zh-axis vibration
Dong et al. A proposed theory on biodynamic frequency weighting for hand-transmitted vibration exposure
Kihlberg et al. Acute effects of vibration from a chipping hammer and a grinder on the hand-arm system.
Dong et al. Measurement of biodynamic response of human hand–arm system
Dong et al. On-the-hand measurement methods for assessing effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves
Pinto et al. Protection effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves: field evaluation and laboratory performance assessment
Bovenzi et al. Changes over a workshift in aesthesiometric and vibrotactile perception thresholds of workers exposed to intermittent hand transmitted vibration from impact wrenches.
Dong et al. A method for assessing the effectiveness of anti-vibration gloves using biodynamic responses of the hand–arm system
Milosevic et al. Evaluation of protective gloves and working techniques for reducing hand-arm vibration exposure in the workplace
Maeda et al. Assessing correlation of human response to vibration through vibrotactile threshold shift with vibration exposure determined on the subject
Schröder et al. Influence of coupling forces on the mechanical impedance of the hand-arm system during rotational vibration excitation around the xh-axis
Burström et al. Vibrotactile perception and effects of short-term exposure to hand-arm vibration
Pettersson et al. Skin temperature responses to hand-arm vibration in cold and thermoneutral ambient temperatures
Almagirby et al. A new methodology for measuring the vibration transmission from handle to finger whilst gripping
Maeda et al. Validity of VPT (Vibrotactile Perception Threshold) as an Indicator of Human Response to Vibration Exposure
Austad et al. Hand-arm vibration exposure monitoring with wearable sensor module
Anderson et al. Human machine interactions and the human response to vibration
Kowalski et al. Research on Simultaneous Impact of Hand–Arm and Whole-Body Vibration
Dong et al. Effectiveness of a transfer function method for evaluating vibration isolation performance of gloves when used with chipping hammers
Aziz et al. New regression model for predicting hand‐arm vibration (HAV) of Malaysian Army (MA) three‐tonne truck steering wheels
MAEDA et al. Vibrotactile TTS of fingertip vibratory sensation from hand-transmitted vibration having the same equal equivalent tool vibration levels according to the JIS B 4900 determination method
Almagirby Understanding vibration transmitted to the human finger