Di Fiore et al., 2008 - Google Patents
Retention of teeth versus extraction and implant placement: treatment preferences of dental faculty and dental studentsDi Fiore et al., 2008
View PDF- Document ID
- 4897139047016712614
- Author
- Di Fiore P
- Tam L
- Thai H
- Hittelman E
- Norman R
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Journal of Dental Education
External Links
Snippet
The purpose of this study was to determine the treatment preferences amongst dental faculty and dental students for either retention of teeth by endodontic and restorative treatment or extraction and implant placement. A survey of 134 general dentistry faculty and 253 senior …
- 239000007943 implant 0 title abstract description 77
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C19/00—Dental auxiliary appliances
- A61C19/04—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry
- A61C19/05—Measuring instruments specially adapted for dentistry for determining occlusion
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/0003—Making bridge-work, inlays, implants or the like
- A61C13/0004—Computer-assisted sizing or machining of dental prostheses
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/225—Fastening prostheses in the mouth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C13/00—Dental prostheses; Making same
- A61C13/08—Artificial teeth; Making same
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q50/00—Systems or methods specially adapted for a specific business sector, e.g. utilities or tourism
- G06Q50/10—Services
- G06Q50/22—Health care, e.g. hospitals; Social work
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C8/00—Means to be fixed to the jaw-bone for consolidating natural teeth or for fixing dental prostheses thereon; Dental implants; Implanting tools
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C1/00—Dental machines for boring or cutting; General features of dental machines or apparatus, e.g. hand-piece design
- A61C1/08—Machine parts specially adapted for dentistry
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61C—DENTISTRY; APPARATUS OR METHODS FOR ORAL OR DENTAL HYGIENE
- A61C5/00—Filling or capping teeth
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61K—PREPARATIONS FOR MEDICAL, DENTAL, OR TOILET PURPOSES
- A61K6/00—Preparations for dentistry
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Joda et al. | Time efficiency, difficulty, and operator's preference comparing digital and conventional implant impressions: a randomized controlled trial | |
Derks et al. | Patient‐reported outcomes of dental implant therapy in a large randomly selected sample | |
Hooper et al. | Implant‐supported facial prostheses provided by a maxillofacial unit in a UK regional hospital: longevity and patient opinions | |
Honey et al. | Ready for practice? A study of confidence levels of final year dental students at Cardiff University and University College Cork | |
Plasschaert et al. | Profile and competences for the European dentist | |
Dueled et al. | Professional and patient‐based evaluation of oral rehabilitation in patients with tooth agenesis | |
Kanno et al. | A review of the shortened dental arch concept focusing on the work by the Käyser/Nijmegen group | |
Azarpazhooh et al. | A survey of patients' preferences for the treatment of teeth with apical periodontitis | |
Fueki et al. | Effect of prosthetic restoration on oral health‐related quality of life in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study | |
Ravidà et al. | Comparison of three different types of implant‐supported fixed dental prostheses: A long‐term retrospective study of clinical outcomes and cost‐effectiveness | |
Thalji et al. | Maxillary complete denture outcomes: a systematic review of patient-based outcomes. | |
Yiu et al. | Self‐perceived preparedness for dental practice amongst graduates of The University of Hong Kong’s integrated PBL dental curriculum | |
Raes et al. | A case‐control study assessing oral‐health‐related quality of life after immediately loaded single implants in healed alveolar ridges or extraction sockets | |
Insua et al. | Patient‐centered perspectives and understanding of peri‐implantitis | |
Reissmann et al. | The randomized shortened dental arch study: temporomandibular disorder pain | |
Cakir et al. | Evaluation of the efficacy of mandibular conventional and implant prostheses in a group of Turkish patients: a quality of life study | |
Fueki et al. | Factors related to prosthetic restoration in patients with shortened dental arches: a multicentre study | |
Wenteler et al. | Factors influencing root canal retreatment strategies by general practitioners and specialists in A ustralia | |
Bigras et al. | Differences in clinical decision making: a comparison between specialists and general dentists | |
Kalsi et al. | The influence of patients' decisions on treatment planning in restorative dentistry | |
Kronström et al. | Patient evaluation after treatment with maxillary implant‐supported overdentures | |
Junges et al. | Dental care providers' decision making regarding maintenance of compromised teeth and implant therapy indication: an analysis of gender and enrollment in teaching positions | |
Sanz et al. | Biological aspects: Summary and consensus statements of group 2. The 5th EAO Consensus Conference 2018 | |
Patil et al. | Esthetic evaluation of anterior single‐tooth implants with different abutment designs—Patients’ satisfaction compared to dentists’ observations | |
Di Fiore et al. | Retention of teeth versus extraction and implant placement: treatment preferences of dental faculty and dental students |