Wang et al., 2015 - Google Patents
The relationship between EABR and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant recipientsWang et al., 2015
- Document ID
- 4678895029696563309
- Author
- Wang Y
- Pan T
- Deshpande S
- Ma F
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- American Journal of Audiology
External Links
Snippet
Purpose The primary purpose of the present study was to investigate the relationship between postimplant electrically evoked auditory brainstem response (EABR) measures (wave V threshold, wave V latency, input–output functions) and auditory performance and …
- 239000007943 implant 0 title abstract description 9
Classifications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/04—Detecting, measuring or recording bioelectric signals of the body of parts thereof
- A61B5/0476—Electroencephalography
- A61B5/0484—Electroencephalography using evoked response
- A61B5/04845—Electroencephalography using evoked response acoustically or auditory
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/68—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient
- A61B5/6801—Arrangements of detecting, measuring or recording means, e.g. sensors, in relation to patient specially adapted to be attached to or worn on the body surface
- A61B5/6813—Specially adapted to be attached to a specific body part
- A61B5/6814—Head
- A61B5/6815—Ear
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/12—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity
- A61B5/121—Audiometering Evaluation or the auditory system, not limited to hearing capacity evaluating hearing capacity
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61N—ELECTROTHERAPY; MAGNETOTHERAPY; RADIATION THERAPY; ULTRASOUND THERAPY
- A61N1/00—Electrotherapy; Circuits therefor
- A61N1/18—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes
- A61N1/32—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents
- A61N1/36—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers
- A61N1/36032—Applying electric currents by contact electrodes alternating or intermittent currents for stimulation, e.g. heart pace-makers of the outer, middle or inner ear, e.g. cochlear implants
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/16—Devices for psychotechnics; Testing reaction times; Devices for evaluating the psychological state
- A61B5/165—Evaluating the state of mind, e.g. depression, anxiety
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/48—Other medical applications
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/40—Detecting, measuring or recording for evaluating the nervous system
- A61B5/4076—Diagnosing or monitoring particular conditions of the nervous system
-
- A—HUMAN NECESSITIES
- A61—MEDICAL OR VETERINARY SCIENCE; HYGIENE
- A61B—DIAGNOSIS; SURGERY; IDENTIFICATION
- A61B5/00—Detecting, measuring or recording for diagnostic purposes; Identification of persons
- A61B5/145—Measuring characteristics of blood in vivo, e.g. gas concentration, pH value; Measuring characteristics of body fluids or tissues, e.g. interstitial fluid, cerebral tissue
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01N—INVESTIGATING OR ANALYSING MATERIALS BY DETERMINING THEIR CHEMICAL OR PHYSICAL PROPERTIES
- G01N33/00—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups
- G01N33/48—Investigating or analysing materials by specific methods not covered by the preceding groups biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Haemocytometers
- G01N33/50—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing
- G01N33/5005—Chemical analysis of biological material, e.g. blood, urine; Testing involving biospecific ligand binding methods; Immunological testing involving human or animal cells
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Anderson et al. | Auditory brainstem response to complex sounds predicts self-reported speech-in-noise performance | |
Tomblin et al. | The effect of age at cochlear implant initial stimulation on expressive language growth in infants and toddlers | |
Hopyan-Misakyan et al. | Recognition of affective speech prosody and facial affect in deaf children with unilateral right cochlear implants | |
Caposecco et al. | Cochlear implant outcomes in adults and adolescents with early-onset hearing loss | |
Wang et al. | The relationship between EABR and auditory performance and speech intelligibility outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant recipients | |
Alvarenga et al. | Speech perception and cortical auditory evoked potentials in cochlear implant users with auditory neuropathy spectrum disorders | |
Gaurav et al. | Effects of age at cochlear implantation on auditory outcomes in cochlear implant recipient children | |
Faulkner et al. | Some observations about cochlear implants: challenges and future directions | |
Munro et al. | Obligatory cortical auditory evoked potential waveform detection and differentiation using a commercially available clinical system: HEARLab™ | |
Formeister et al. | Intraoperative round window electrocochleography and speech perception outcomes in pediatric cochlear implant recipients | |
Nathani et al. | On the robustness of vocal development: An examination of infants with moderate-to-severe hearing loss and additional risk factors | |
Holder et al. | Effect of increased daily cochlear implant use on auditory perception in adults | |
Gifford | Who is a cochlear implant candidate? | |
Liang et al. | Evaluation of auditory cortical development in the early stages of post cochlear implantation using mismatch negativity measurement | |
Hua et al. | Speech recognition and cognitive skills in bimodal cochlear implant users | |
Jahn et al. | Electrophysiological estimates of the electrode–neuron interface differ between younger and older listeners with cochlear implants | |
Skidmore et al. | Prediction of the functional status of the cochlear nerve in individual cochlear implant users using machine learning and electrophysiological measures | |
Purdy et al. | Change in speech perception and auditory evoked potentials over time after unilateral cochlear implantation in postlingually deaf adults | |
BinKhamis et al. | Speech auditory brainstem responses: Effects of background, stimulus duration, consonant–vowel, and number of epochs | |
Brown et al. | Cortical auditory evoked potentials recorded from nucleus hybrid cochlear implant users | |
Forli et al. | Cochlear implant in prelingually deafened oralist adults: speech perception outcomes, subjective benefits and quality of life improvement | |
Billings | Uses and limitations of electrophysiology with hearing aids | |
Thabet et al. | Cortical auditory evoked potential (P1): a potential objective indicator for auditory rehabilitation outcome | |
Jahn et al. | Spectral resolution development in children with normal hearing and with cochlear implants: A review of behavioral studies | |
Cowan et al. | Clinical performance, safety, and patient-reported outcomes of an active osseointegrated bone-conduction hearing implant system at 24-month follow-up |