Parolai et al., 2020 - Google Patents
Could a Decentralized Onsite Earthquake Early Warning System Help in Mitigating Seismic Risk in Northeastern Italy? The Case of the 1976 M s 6.5 Friuli EarthquakeParolai et al., 2020
View PDF- Document ID
- 4438485726715151564
- Author
- Parolai S
- Moratto L
- Bertoni M
- Scaini C
- Rebez A
- Publication year
- Publication venue
- Seismological Society of America
External Links
Snippet
In May 1976, a devastating earthquake of magnitude M s 6.5 occurred in Friuli, Italy, resulting in 976 deaths, 2000 injured, and 60,000 homeless. It is notable that, at the time of the earthquake, only one station was installed in the affected region. The resulting lack of …
- 230000000116 mitigating 0 title abstract description 21
Classifications
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V1/00—Seismology; Seismic or acoustic prospecting or detecting
- G01V1/008—Earthquake measurement or prediction
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G06—COMPUTING; CALCULATING; COUNTING
- G06Q—DATA PROCESSING SYSTEMS OR METHODS, SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES; SYSTEMS OR METHODS SPECIALLY ADAPTED FOR ADMINISTRATIVE, COMMERCIAL, FINANCIAL, MANAGERIAL, SUPERVISORY OR FORECASTING PURPOSES, NOT OTHERWISE PROVIDED FOR
- G06Q10/00—Administration; Management
- G06Q10/06—Resources, workflows, human or project management, e.g. organising, planning, scheduling or allocating time, human or machine resources; Enterprise planning; Organisational models
- G06Q10/063—Operations research or analysis
-
- G—PHYSICS
- G01—MEASURING; TESTING
- G01V—GEOPHYSICS; GRAVITATIONAL MEASUREMENTS; DETECTING MASSES OR OBJECTS
- G01V2210/00—Details of seismic processing or analysis
- G01V2210/30—Noise handling
- G01V2210/32—Noise reduction
- G01V2210/322—Trace stacking
Similar Documents
Publication | Publication Date | Title |
---|---|---|
Atkinson et al. | Relationships between felt intensity and instrumental ground motion in the central United States and California | |
Bozorgnia et al. | Ground motion model for the vertical-to-horizontal (V/H) ratios of PGA, PGV, and response spectra | |
Danciu et al. | Engineering ground-motion parameters attenuation relationships for Greece | |
Kaka et al. | Relationships between instrumental ground-motion parameters and modified Mercalli intensity in eastern North America | |
US20140324356A1 (en) | Apparatus for evaluating safety of building using earthquake acceleration measurement | |
Rydelek et al. | Real-time seismic warning with a two-station subarray | |
Jayaram et al. | Correlation of response spectral values in Japanese ground motions | |
Zahradnik et al. | Quick fault-plane identification by a geometrical method: Application to the Mw 6.2 Leonidio earthquake, 6 January 2008, Greece | |
Skarlatoudis et al. | Ground‐motion prediction equations of intermediate‐depth earthquakes in the Hellenic arc, southern Aegean subduction area | |
Heidari | Quick estimation of the magnitude and epicentral distance using the P wave for earthquakes in Iran | |
Baumann et al. | Evaluating the compatibility of dynamic rupture‐based synthetic ground motion with empirical ground‐motion prediction equation | |
Dhakal et al. | Peak ground motions and characteristics of nonlinear site response during the 2018 Mw 6.6 Hokkaido eastern Iburi earthquake | |
Papazachos et al. | Accelerating seismic crustal deformation in the southern Aegean area | |
Montalva et al. | Strong ground motion prediction model for PGV and spectral velocity for the Chilean subduction zone | |
Xie et al. | Rupture directivity effects on strong ground motion during the 15 April 2016 M W 7.0 Kumamoto earthquake in Japan | |
Hutchison et al. | Ambient tectonic tremor in the San Jacinto fault, near the Anza Gap, detected by multiple mini seismic arrays | |
Kumar et al. | Earthquake genesis and earthquake early warning systems: challenges and a way forward | |
Parolai et al. | Could a Decentralized Onsite Earthquake Early Warning System Help in Mitigating Seismic Risk in Northeastern Italy? The Case of the 1976 M s 6.5 Friuli Earthquake | |
Necmioğlu | Design and challenges for a tsunami early warning system in the Marmara Sea | |
McKenna et al. | Remote structural infrasound: Case studies of real-time infrastructure system monitoring | |
Auclair et al. | Feasibility and interest in earthquake early warning systems for areas of moderate seismicity: Case study for the Pyrenees | |
Lockman et al. | Magnitude-period scaling relations for Japan and the Pacific Northwest: Implications for earthquake early warning | |
Rowshandel | Incorporating source rupture characteristics into ground-motion hazard analysis models | |
Massa et al. | Introducing ISMDq—A web portal for real‐time quality monitoring of italian strong‐motion data | |
Khalil et al. | Probabilistic seismic hazard assessments of Sabah, east Malaysia: accounting for local earthquake activity near Ranau |