Jon E. Schoenfield, <a href="/A023110/b023110_9.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..70</a> (terms 1..38 from David W. Wilson, terms 39..40 from Robert G. Wilson v, terms 41..67 from Dmitry Petukhov)
reviewed
approved
proposed
reviewed
editing
proposed
Jon E. Schoenfield, <a href="/A023110/b023110_9.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..70</a> (terms 1..38 from David W. Wilson, terms 39..40 from Robert G. Wilson v, terms 41..67 from Dmitry Petukhov)
Dmitry Petukhov, <a href="/A023110/b023110.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..67</a> [Terms 1 to 38 by David W. Wilson; terms 39 to 40 by Robert G. Wilson v, Jan 16 2012; terms 41 to 67 by Dmitry Petukhov, Feb 12 2016]
Jon E. Schoenfield, <a href="/A023110/b023110_9.txt">Table of n, a(n) for n = 1..70</a>
approved
editing
proposed
approved
editing
proposed
Appears to satisfy a(n)=1444*a(n-7)+a(n-14)-76*sqrt(a(n-7)*a(n-14)) for n >= 16. For n = 15, 14, 13, ... this would require a(1) = 16, a(0) = 49, a(-1) = 169, ... - Henry Bottomley, May 08 2001; edited by _Robert Israel_, Sep 28 2014
Henry Bottomley's comment edited by Robert Israel, Sep 28 2014
proposed
editing
editing
proposed