GerardM

Hello

This is an important message regarding this page.

This page uses Structured Discussions/Flow, an obsolete tool that causes many maintenance problems. It has been decided to remove this tool from the wikis.

As of December 16, it will no longer be possible to add a new topic or post a message on this page.

Before this date, you can move or have this page moved to a subpage, in order to archive it. Once moved, this page will become a standard discussion page.

If you get this message on your personal talk page, it is probably because you turned Structured Discussions on, using the Beta features page. Please check there if you can to turn Structured Discussions off.

If you haven't moved this page by December 16, a script will automatically move the page to an archive page (the format will be Page name/Flow). The page using Structured Discussions/Flow will then be made read-only.

If you have any questions, please let me know!

Trizek_(WMF)

Hi Gerard, you've created Michael Kahn (Q77645289) without a description or a source. Please provide a valid source or the item must be deleted.

someone by that name has is given an award, to make the list of awardees complete, it is essential to have him. ~~~~

This is an answer to a question I didn't ask. Now you've added the URL:

• https://www.assaf.org.za/index.php/about-assaf/governance?id=23:members-list&catid=36:governance

This is an outdated URL without abgerufen am (P813). May I repeat: Please provide a valid source or the item must be deleted.

@Epìdosis: It seems to be a mass import: Steven Karataglidis (Q77647971), Colin Kenyon (Q77705176) etc. Can you check how many of this unsource items have been created? "In 2021, the academy had 632 members" (enWP).

The items with premio ricevuto (P166)Member of the Academy of Science of South Africa (Q75746002) are 564 (query); out of them, 19 have no sitelinks and no references but some external identifiers (query) and 250 have no sitelinks no references and no external identifiers (query). I agree that the items in the last group do not meet presently WD:N, so they need references and/or identifiers as soon as possible (or a mass deletion).

Removing the items that are notable because they have incoming links from other items, we still reach 238 (query).

Congratulations. I'm sorry, but you were wrong when you wrote again that Mykhailo Baran was a Polish citizen. Please read carefully the articles about Mykhailo Baran on the Ukrainian and Polish Wikipedias. Thank you. Good luck

You chose to undo where you could have made a change. One is intrusive serves no purpose the other is what I do when need be.

I do everything right. you write not true - that's why I cancel. Besides, I repeat: please read carefully the articles about Mykhailo Baran on the Ukrainian and Polish Wikipedias. the fact that you wrote an insult to me is also not good. Today is January 28, 2024, [https://www.wikidata.org/w/index.php?title=Q4077665&diff=prev&oldid=143490439 and the mistake you made was back on July 10, 2014]...

When you are so sure about what you do, then you must be surprised with the feedback. I have a few million edits, many of them are imported and I will not read any and all argument why they are wrong. I do not read articles and you can change what you like.

It is great that you have done so much. ) But... it's not good that you sometimes edit without reading the articles and spread the mistakes of other Wikipedians. In the element about Mykhailo Baran, almost everything was a mistake before my edits... Someone called him a Polish politician - and others with the help of bots only made it worse... therefore, I ask you to remove the false information that Mykhailo Baran was a citizen of Poland. Thank you.

Hi. You are wrong, because a country called Poland did not exist in 1839-1889. In what language are you referring to the article about him? wikipedia is a non-authoritative source. currently there are a lot of errors on Wikidata, in particular, some editors do not know the difference between Ukraine and russia at all, wrote many errors earlier... besides, you just told a something that isn't true. I looked at articles about him on those Wikipedias that I can read and edited (Ukrainian, English, Polish, Russian). Nowhere is it indicated that he was a citizen of Poland, which appeared on the world map in 1918. It seems that you still do not know that information from Wikidata goes to different Wikipedias, and not the other way around.

and you are wrong by insisting on reverting an edit. Much better to just edit it properly. I do not care I care about my peace and quiet

Please correct your mistake. The only thing I insist on is that there is no false information in this item. Thanks. Good luck

Are Complex Creative Systems (Q117382535) and Complex Creative Systems (Q117382521) exactly the same paper?

Dear GerardM,

I hope you are doing well,

I am Kholoud, a researcher at King's College London, and I am working on a project as part of my PhD research, in which I have developed a personalised recommender model that suggests Wikidata items for the editors based on their past edits. I am inviting you to a task-based study that will ask you to provide your judgments about the relevance of the items suggested by our model based on your previous edits. Participation is completely voluntary, and your cooperation will enable us to evaluate the accuracy of the recommender system in suggesting relevant items to you. We will analyse the results anonymised, and they will be published to a research venue.

The study should take no more than 15 minutes.

If you agree to participate in this study, please either contact me at kholoud.alghamdi@kcl.ac.uk or use this form https://docs.google.com/forms/d/e/1FAIpQLSees9WzFXR0Vl3mHLkZCaByeFHRrBy51kBca53euq9nt3XWog/viewform?usp=sf_link

Then, I will contact you with the link to start the study.

For more information about the study, please read this post: https://www.wikidata.org/wiki/User:Kholoudsaa In case you have further questions or require more information, don't hesitate to contact me through my mentioned email.

Thank you for considering taking part in this research.

Regards

Please explain this more deeply.

talk about cryptic

Would it be possible to add descriptions on this prize in a few languages you'd probably speak?

just google, that is what I did

Yes, but it is your item.

Consider the amount of items I created, edited. Their point is that they are nodes in a web of information. This item links people through this award. I do not add descriptions becaused automated descriptions are superior.

I see you reverted my removal of FAHMS from the two above women - Q51547027 and Q21537224. I have been unable to discover any reference to their being elected Fellows. I'd appreciate your adding your reference to the entries please.--~~~~

When your considered opinion is that something is wrong, you fix it. From a process point of view, i am happy with my work. When your aim is to get my attention, you have it and I stand by my process. So fix it and I am fine. Bother me and you have this as a result.

Please provide a reference as requested. If I could find one, I would. I am checking their status with the Academy.

The following items are duplicates: Q110653266, Q110653267, Q110653269.

What the source?

This person is not in the database for this award

You roll back without a comment. That is a bother and given no argument it deserved its roll back.

1. My comment "ее нет в базе https://righteous.yadvashem.org"
2. What is the source for adding this award?